The SPLC is Tracking Tweets About Christmas as ‘Hate’

Photo credit: Grumpy Santa by Richard Elzey via Flickr.

I must confess Ive often scoffed at the idea that there was a War on Christmas, much less that anyone attempting to wage such a war had any hope of victory against the biggest holiday celebrated in America (and much of the world).

But then here comes the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), with their new project: a hate tracker that is monitoring Twitter trends of extremists, including topics like Christmas.

The SPLC Hate Tracker launched a few months ago with a website (hatetracker.io) and a Twitter account (@splchatetracker). According to the website, the projects purpose is to detect trends in a community of far-right Twitter usersa range of extremists from the conspiratorial fringes of mainstream conservatism to outright white supremacists.

Screenshot from hatetracker.io, dated December 26, 2017.

Very little of this information is on the @splchatetracker Twitter account, which simply posts the latest top trend and also trending topics from their data. While some of the topics are associated with white nationalist groups like #altright, #whitegenocide, and #deportthemall, many topics are ones that no reasonable person would consider hateful, like #armynavygame, a reference to the annual college football matchup between the U.S. Naval Academy and West Point, or general news topics.

In recent days, the list has been dominated by Christmas topics, like #christmaseve, #christmas, #merrychristmas, #religion, and #jesus.

Some tweets combine Christmas topics with more controversial ones.

The account used to post a link to the website in their tweets, including a description of their project as Tracking trending topics among far-right Twitter accounts, but they stopped doing this for some unknown reason in early December.

The claimed sources for these tweets are SPLCs list of hate groups, a list of domestic organizations which they update at the beginning of every year. This list starts with various KKK and neo-Nazi groups but as you scroll down the list, youll find a number of groups that seem to be included for the crime of espousing Christian values or simply being conservative.

Liberty Counsel, a pro-bono law firm dedicated to defending religious liberty, is listed in the same category as the Westboro Baptist Church. Other organizations on the list may be hardliners on immigration policy, like FAIR and ALIPAC, but advocating for stronger border security and severe limits on immigration is not in and of itself hate.

Except, apparently, in the minds of the SPLC.

On the FAQ page, they insist that they are not listing organizations as hate groups merely for being conservative or espousing Biblical principles, and even make a point to highlight that they include some groups viewed as anti-white and leftist like the New Black Panther Party and the Nation of Islam. But still, its the groups on the right that are their main concern:

But, as a general matter, prejudice on the basis of factors such as race is more prevalent on the far right than it is on the far left.

This does not mean that extremism and violence on the far left are not concerns. But groups that engage in anti-fascist violence (antifa), for example, differ from hate groups in that they are not typically organized around bigotry against people based on the characteristics listed above.

It should also be noted that the SPLC Hate Tracker mentions monitoring the trends of only far-right Twitter accounts. Iwas also unable to find any clarification on exactly which Twitter accounts SPLC was monitoring in order to produce this data.

Even if youre willing to be charitable and give the SPLC the benefit of the doubt that their main goal isnt to demonize conservatives, its hard to argue that isnt the practical result of this project. When they fail to be fully transparent about their data sources and the Twitter account posts that they are a hate tracker monitoring topics like Christmas, what is a reasonable person supposed to believe, other than they consider tweeting about Christmas a potentially hateful activity?

The SPLC put their cards on the table when they expressly state they are monitoring far-right Twitter accounts, but not far-left accounts. They also assert that many hate groups operate in the mainstream.

Can organizations operating in the mainstream be hate groups?

Yes. In fact, its even more important to call out groups that demonize others while having a foothold in the mainstream. Its easy to recognize the hater in a white sheet for what he or she is. Its the wolf in sheeps clothing thats harder to identify.

What the SPLC should realize is that this clumsily-executed Hate Tracker project is providing fuel to the fire for those who have used a perceived War on Christmas as a rallying cry, clickbait method, or fundraising appeal.

President Donald Trump campaigned on ending the War on Christmas and has been taking credit for making it OK to say Merry Christmas again, a claim that has caused many in the media to scoff.

This War on Christmas has been a topic of countless commentary panels on Fox News Channel programs and fundraising pleas from conservative groups. In my email inbox today was one such missive, exhorting supporters to celebrate the holiday season and pray while we still can.

If the SPLC is going to insist on tweeting that #christmas is something worth monitoring as potentially hateful and make such a concerted effort to connect hate groups with mainstream conservatism, they should consider reporting their expenses for the SPLC Hate Tracker as an in-kind contribution to Trumps reelection campaign.

[Note about authenticity: I was originally skeptical that @splchatetracker was a real account, but the hatetracker.io website uses the exact same logo and design as the official SPLC website, and contains multiple links to official SPLC content. I called the phone number listed for a media contact on the SPLC website for a comment, but have not received a response. If I do, I will update this article.]

Photo credit: Grumpy Santa by Richard Elzey via Flickr.

Follow Sarah Rumpf on Twitter: @rumpfshaker.

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Read this article:

The SPLC is Tracking Tweets About Christmas as ‘Hate’

Related Post

December 29, 2017   Posted in: SPLC |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."