Klan leader: We’re not a hate group

CECIL COUNTY, Md. — Members of the Ku Klux Klan repeatedly told people in attendance at a meeting in Cecil County on Friday night that they don’t have a problem with people of other colors. They’re just part of an organization that wants to take back their country, which they feel is going down the wrong path. “If we don’t stop Barack Obama, if we don’t stop this government all together that is running us into the ground, working us like dogs, so that they can keep taking it and giving it to somebody else, we’re not going to have a country,” said Richard Preston, imperial wizard of the 2-year-old Confederate White Knights of Rosedale, Md., said. Preston spoke to about 50 people in attendance at the Cecil County Administration Building near Elkton. Friday’s meeting was part of an ongoing attempt by this group and other Klan chapters to gain support for their organization and to start shedding their hate-group image. But not all in the assembly are buying the Klan’s new image. Kalil Zaky, an African American, asked Preston how the Klan was not considered a hate group based on its history. Preston said the Klan was not a hate group, adding others have labeled it as such. Preston did say there were things done during the Civil Rights era that were wrong, but they are no longer this group. “We can only ask you to trust us,” Preston told him. Zaky, who left before the nearly two-hour meeting ended, was not convinced. “It doesn’t make sense,” Zaky said. “I don’t understand how you can have that kind of reputation and how you can do all those awful things. … If that’s what they want to do and if they’re not a hate group any more they should just take a whole different approach.” The group and other Klan chapters are planning to have more public meetings across the country.


Fair Usage Law

December 21, 2013  Tags: , , , , , , , , ,   Posted in: Ku Klux Klan  Comments Closed

Maryland congressman apologizes for Holocaust reference

September 7, 2012 (JTA) — A Maryland congressman apologized for referring to the Holocaust as he discussed his opposition to federal involvement in providing student loans. Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-Md.) apologized Thursday for the remarks, which drew criticism


Fair Usage Law

September 7, 2012  Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,   Posted in: Holocaust  Comments Closed

Life sentence in Mississippi hate-crime case

Deryl Dedmon, 19, of Brandon, Mississippi, has been sentenced in the killing of James Anderson. STORY HIGHLIGHTS Editor’s note: This story contains language that some readers may consider offensive.


Fair Usage Law

March 23, 2012  Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,   Posted in: Morris Dees  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."