Twitter Bars Milo Yiannopoulos in Wake of Leslie Joness …

SAN FRANCISCO For years, one of the main grievances among Twitter users has been the ability of anonymous trolls to send abusive comments to other people on the service.

But on Tuesday, Twitter barred one of the most egregious and consistent offenders of its terms of service, Milo Yiannopoulos, in an attempt to show that it is cracking down on abuse.

The ban against Mr. Yiannopoulos, a technology editor at the conservative news site Breitbart and known by his Twitter handle, @Nero, follows a campaign of prolonged abuse against Leslie Jones, a comedian and co-star of the recently released Ghostbusters movie. The film and its stars have come under fire from various parts of the internet for months, after it was first revealed that the reboot of the 1984 film would feature an all-female cast.

Ms. Jones in particular has borne the brunt of the online abuse in recent days, especially since the release of Ghostbusters in the United States on Friday. Hundreds of anonymous Twitter commenters hurled racist and sexist remarks at the stars Twitter account, rallied and directed by Mr. Yiannopoulos this week. The news media picked up on the abuse after Ms. Jones began retweeting screenshots of the litany of comments sent to her over the past few days.

On Monday evening, Ms. Jones quit using Twitter with a final message of exasperation after days of near-nonstop abuse. I leave Twitter tonight with tears and a very sad heart, Ms. Jones tweeted. All this cause I did a movie.

In a statement, a Twitter spokesman said: People should be able to express diverse opinions and beliefs on Twitter. But no one deserves to be subjected to targeted abuse online, and our rules prohibit inciting or engaging in the targeted abuse or harassment of others.

Twitter did not comment directly on Mr. Yiannopouloss account or actions of the past 48 hours, but the spokesman said over that period, Weve seen an uptick in the number of accounts violating these policies and have taken enforcement actions against these accounts, ranging from warnings that also require the deletion of tweets violating our policies to permanent suspension.

In a brief interview on Tuesday evening, Mr. Yiannopoulos said, This is the beginning of the end for Twitter.

Some people are going to find this perfectly acceptable, he said. Anyone who believes in free speech or is a conservative certainly will not.

The move stops short of providing Twitters 300-million-plus users with effective tools to combat trolls and abuse on a much larger scale, an issue that celebrities and everyday users alike deal with on a regular basis.

In the past, Twitter, the San Francisco-based social media company, has faced criticism for its handling of the so-called GamerGate controversy, as women in the gaming community were increasingly harassed on Twitter often to the point of receiving death threats in the wake of a dispute in the online gaming community.

Twitter has said that dealing with abuse and trust and safety issues is one of its top priorities, though it has not detailed how it will handle the issues in the future.

We know many people believe we have not done enough to curb this type of behavior on Twitter, the company said in a statement. We agree.

Twitter said it is investing in improving its tools and enforcement systems, and is in the process of reviewing its hateful conduct policies to prohibit additional types of abusive behavior and allow more types of reporting, with the goal of reducing the burden on the person being targeted, according to a statement. Twitter said it expected to detail more of that in the coming weeks.

See the rest here:

Twitter Bars Milo Yiannopoulos in Wake of Leslie Joness …

Fair Usage Law

December 12, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Milo Yiannopoulos  Comments Closed

#Apartheid hashtag on Twitter

@IDF An article on how the #IDF murdered Palestinian during “violent clash”. Killing a disabled man who was calmly walking away…..As usual, justice will only be served the day this #apartheid regime is brought down, for in your eyes, any murderer of an Arab is a hero.

See original here:

#Apartheid hashtag on Twitter

Fair Usage Law

December 11, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Apartheid  Comments Closed

How to pronounce apartheid: HowToPronounce.com

Rate How Difficult to Pronounce this word

Very Easy

Easy

Moderate

Difficult

Extremely Difficult

Thanks for your vote!

1 Meaning, 5 Sentences and 1 Another word found for apartheid.

apartheid Translate not foundIf you know the Translate of this word, share it.

2.Melanie Verwoerd, 47, Was Born Into An Afrikaner Family At The Height Of apartheid And Married The Grandson Of Its Architect Before Joining The Anc

3.Missouri Racial Violence Recalls apartheid, U.n. Rights Chief Says

4.’apartheid Is Flourishing’ In Us, Says Un High Commissioner For Human Rights

5.Crime Against Humanity: What Makes Israel An apartheid Regime

apartheid Antonyms not foundIf you know the Antonyms of this word, share it.

Go here to read the rest:

How to pronounce apartheid: HowToPronounce.com

Fair Usage Law

December 11, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Apartheid  Comments Closed

Martin Luther King Day 2019, 2020 and further – 2018 Calendar

View below the dates for (among others) Martin Luther King Day 2019 and Martin Luther King Day 2020. You can also see on which day the holiday falls and how many days it is until this holiday. DateHolidayDayWeek numberDays to goJanuary 15, 2018 Martin Luther King Day 2018 Monday 3 -January 21, 2019 Martin Luther King Day 2019 Monday 4 41January 20, 2020 Martin Luther King Day 2020 Monday 4 405January 18, 2021 Martin Luther King Day 2021 Monday 3 769January 17, 2022 Martin Luther King Day 2022 Monday 3 1133January 16, 2023 Martin Luther King Day 2023 Monday 3 1497January 15, 2024 Martin Luther King Day 2024 Monday 3 1861January 20, 2025 Martin Luther King Day 2025 Monday 4 2232January 19, 2026 Martin Luther King Day 2026 Monday 4 2596January 18, 2027 Martin Luther King Day 2027 Monday 3 2960January 17, 2028 Martin Luther King Day 2028 Monday 3 3324Significance of Martin Luther King Day 2019 (Jr.)Martin Luther King Day 2019 is an annual federal American holiday that celebrates the birthday of Martin Luther King Jr. (January 15). It celebrates the life and achievements of this influential American civil rights leader. History of Martin Luther King DayThe idea of Martin Luther King Day 2019 as a holiday was promoted soon after his assassination in 1968. After King’s death, United States Democrat Representative, John Conyers and, United State Republican Senator, Edward Brooke introduced a bill in Congress to make King’s birthday a national holiday.

The bill first came to a vote in the United States House of Representatives in 1979 and fell five votes short of the number needed. There were two main arguments mentioned by opponents, the first being that a paid holiday for federal employees would be too expensive and, secondly, that a holiday to honour the birth (of a private citizen who had never held public office) would be contrary to the longstanding tradition.

The effort received more publicity when, after a decade, shortly after the failure of a bill that was introduced by Representative John Conyers. In September of 1979, Stevie Wonder released a song called “Happy Birthday”. That was meant to make a case for the holiday, calling out anyone who didn’t support the idea. Additionally, Six million signatures were collected for a petition to Congress to pass the law. In 1981, President Ronald Reagan came into office and originally opposed the holiday.

Additionally, Senators, of North Carolina Republicans, Jesse Helms and John Porter East opposed the holiday and questioned whether King was important enough to receive such an honour and criticized King’s opposition to the Vietnam War.

On November 2, 1983, Reagan signed a bill, proposed by Representative Katie Hall of Indiana, to create a federal holiday honouring King. The bill passed the House of Representatives and was observed for the first time on January 20, 1986. Initially, some states resisted observing the holiday only in the year 2000 was it officially observed in all 50 states for the first time.

Some schools celebrate the day by teaching their pupils or students about the work of Martin Luther King and the struggle against racial segregation and racism. In recent years it is encouraged that Americans to give some of their time on this day as volunteers in citizen action groups.

Share this page on Facebook!

Link to Calendar-365.com – Place on your website or blog:

See more here:

Martin Luther King Day 2019, 2020 and further – 2018 Calendar

Fair Usage Law

December 11, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Martin Luther King  Comments Closed

Scoptophilia: Rosario Gallardo – Indoor and outdoor

Rosario Gallardo is not the husband of an exhibitionist lady but the lady helped to exhibit by her husband. They are Italians, from Milan, but seem to be quite often in Barcelona. Their work is marked by a sense of anarchist approach and the term pornoguerilla is without any ambiguity. There’s a part of happenings in this work (see her orgasm via masturbation in a gallery of art here) but also a marital complicity (in a certain way the same than Catherine Millet and her husband except here there’s not explicit sex action with other partners). I really love the impression of liberty, happy transgression, body freedom, ease with physiological functions such as peeing, jubilation to show the most hidden or aesthetically arranged intimate parts of our bodies. Yes, it’s a kind of heaven to live this in a male-female (or female-female like Lexo) love story. And more than the artistic, anarchist and conjugal qualities, it has surely a social function to extricate people from their moral and sexless, guilt-irrigated approach of body. Her site here. An interview (in Italian) there. A blog there.

Excerpt from:
Scoptophilia: Rosario Gallardo – Indoor and outdoor

Fair Usage Law

December 11, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Israel  Comments Closed

Quo Vadis Vatican? Jewish involvement in the radical changes of the Second Vatican Council

Add New Here’s to our murder-less mystery story, where its religious-ecclesiastical background calls for careful threading, though no issues of faith or belief are involved. I am referring to the Second Vatican Council, (1961–1964), some of its deliberations, the shadowy maneuvers that brought them about, and the implications and consequences for the brethren and the […]

Continued here:

Quo Vadis Vatican? Jewish involvement in the radical changes of the Second Vatican Council

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Occidental Observer  Comments Closed

Americas Jewish left endorses anti-Jewish discrimination …

Stephen M. Flatow, an attorney in New Jersey, is the father of Alisa Flatow, who was murdered in an Iranian-sponsored Palestinian terrorist attack in 1995. His book, A Fathers Story: My Fight for Justice Against Iranian Terror, has just been published.

American Jewish peace activists who have spent much of their lives fighting discrimination against ethnic minorities, have decided there is one form of discrimination they support: discrimination against Jews who reside in Judea-Samaria.

I am referring to the open letter about the Airbnb controversy that was issued on December 4 by the New Israel Fund, J Street, Americans for Peace Now, Truah, and Partners for Progressive Israel.

Airbnb announced that it will remove listings in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank that are at the core of the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians.

If Airbnb had removed listings from all communities in that region, that would not be discriminatory. But thats not what it did. Airbnb removed listings only from Israeli (read: Jewish) communities. Arab settlements were not affected.

To appreciate what Airbnb has done, consider the case of the city of Hevron. Some of its Palestinian Arab residents illegally occupy homes that were stolen from Jews during the 1929 pogrom. Deeds exist proving that. Such Palestinian settlements in Hebron are certainly part of the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians. Not only did the Jewish leftwing Gang of Five defend Airbnb in their open letter, but they proceeded to formally delegitimize every Jewish community in Judea-Samaria.But Airbnb is still doing business with them.

And what about illegal Palestinian Arab settlements in Shechem, better known as Nablus? Until the 1930s, there was a large and thriving Jewish community there. Today there is not a single Jewish resident in Shechem. Wonder what ever happened to them? Arab pogromists drove them out and took their homes. Airbnb apparently has no problem with that.

And neither, it seems, do the New Israel Fund, J Street, et al. Not only did the Jewish leftwing Gang of Five defend Airbnb in their open letter, but they proceeded to formally delegitimize every Jewish community in Judea-Samaria.

Airbnbs de-listings will only occur in illegitimate West Bank settlements, the Gang of Five asserted. Airbnb objects to the settlements not because they are Jewish but because they usurp Palestinian land.

The claim that every Jewish community in the territories is illegitimate and usurps Palestinian land is, of course, a vicious lie. It echoes the longtime Arab propaganda argument that Jews have no valid religious, historic, or legal connection to Judea and Samariathe territories that have been the heart of the national Jewish homeland for 3,000 years.

In the view of these five groups, every inch of Judea and Samaria is Palestinian land, and any Jew who lives there is an usurper who deserves to be boycotted, treated as a pariah, and eventually driven out.

Obviously if Jewish leftwing groups choose to support anti-Jewish discriminationby boycotting only Jewish settlements and not Arab onesthat is their right according the U.S. Constitution. And if these groups want to advocate that every inch of Judea and Samaria is usurped Palestinian land, that, too, is their right.

But that does not mean the organized American Jewish community has to treat such racist positions as legitimate.

The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organization overwhelmingly rejected J Streets application for membership several years ago. That was a wise move. Jewish umbrella groups that have relationships with the New Israel Fund and the other members of the Gang of Five should reconsider whether they want to maintain those relationships.

Partners for Progressive Israel (PPI), for example, is a member of the American Zionist Movement. Its fair to ask whether PPIs support for discrimination against Israeli Jews is consistent with the AZMs declared mission is to strengthen the connection of American Jews with Israel; develop their appreciation of the centrality of Israel to Jewish life worldwide; deepen their understanding of Israeli society and the challenges it faces; encourage travel, long-term visits and Aliyah to Israel; and to facilitate dialogue, debate and collective action to further Zionism in the United States and abroad.

Is advocating discrimination against Jews in Judea-Samaria consistent with the AZMs mission statement?

Free speech is a sacred principle. I would never advocate that any point of view should be suppressed or prohibited. At the same time, Jewish umbrella organizations have no obligation to embrace those whose activities conflict with the umbrella groups declared mission. Refraining from such an embrace would not impinge on the radicals right or ability to say what they want. It would simply mean not conferring Jewish communal legitimacy upon those who are now promoting discrimination against some Jews.

Original post:

Americas Jewish left endorses anti-Jewish discrimination …

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Anti-Jewish  Comments Closed

Marcion – Anti-Jewish | Christian Forums

Evidence of his influence is still seen.

Click to expand…

Thankfully, theology itself in the Early Church doesn’t lend itself to the idea to assume that anything pertaining to the OT was automatically within the negative and only that within the NT was good. For the heresy of Marcionism tried to divorce the God of the OT from the God of the NT in a false scenario …but the Early Church valued OT practice (more shared here, here, here) and thankfully combated him…

And even outside of Marcionism, there were others promoting the spirit of lawlessness whenever they would try to add on to what God commanded of believers in the New Covenant and say that it was a matter of keeping the Law – for in doing so, that’d be a matter of sin. This is what the Ebionites (certain camps of them, specifically) were guilty of opposite of Marcion when they advocated the keeping of all aspects of the OT in order to avoid being lawless as they saw it….for going past what Yeshua noted and what God promoted is what lawlessness is about…..and lawlessness was never about not following all things solely in Mosaic code. When God gave different laws to different groups, that was the Law they were to be for – and to go back to a previous system of law was disobedience in itself – as well as promoting the wrong law.

1 John 3:4 [ Sin and the Child of God ] Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness.5 And you know that He was manifested to take away our sins, and in Him there is no sin.

Click to expand…

Sin is what lawlessness is defined by – not systems of law given at one time or another. To those under the Law of Moses, to go past that was SIN – and at the same time, there were others not bound by the Mosaic Law (like Jethro of Midian and others like Noah ) who were given differing requirements/laws (as the Gentiles were outside of Israel ) and to not be faithful to that was SIN – for them. And likewise, in Matthew 7, many quote that saying “That’s the way Yeshua will speak to the Gentiles since they were lawless (i.e. not under Mosaic Code!!!”) yet the context is one where he was speaking primarily to a Jewish audience – warning them of false prophets who were doing many things that were approved of/asked by the Lord…but it wasn’t His HEART nor was it His Will for them.

There’s an excellent paper on the issue elsewhere if interested – as it address the Anti-Semitism present in Marcionism and other systems that developed to combat it and yet went in other directions. ..for the paper explores Ebionism and Marcionism, two early church heresies which depict the two most antithetical forms of the Judaism-OT and Christianity-NT breach in early Christianity. It addresses Ebionism’s philo-Semitlism and Marcionism’s chagrin for the Jewish roots of Christianity – both shown to be antecedents to certain contemporary heretical conceptions …and both having a corrective found in Paul’s metaphor of God’s revelatiory-redemptive olive tree (Romans 1/:/7-24) which aptly describes the dual necessity of the root and the branches, that is the Old and New Testaments.

Follow this link:

Marcion – Anti-Jewish | Christian Forums

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Anti-Jewish  Comments Closed

1967: USS Liberty attacked by submarine USS Amberjack Crew …

1967: USS Liberty attacked by submarine USS Amberjack Crew member blows whistle

1967: USS Liberty attacked by submarine USS Amberjack – Crew member blows whistle

compilation by Ray Songtree

Most accounts of the attack on the USS Liberty off the coast of Gaza in 1967 blame the Israelis.Then President Johnson is blamed for abandoning the ship, in order to not embarrass ally Israel for its mistake.

However, Johnson is quoted as saying I want that goddamn ship going to the bottom! No help, recall the Wings. He did not just say, stay away, he stated his intention. He wanted the ship to be sunk. The submarine USS Amberjack had escorted the Liberty all the way from West Africa. The Amberjack saw everything that happened, but did not aid the Liberty at all. Also recall that just three years before , the USS Maddox was NOT attacked in Gulf of Tonkin, but U.S. declared war on North Vietnam using the controlled media, claiming there was an attack.

For an 8 minute synopsis of what happened on June 8, 1967 and an introduction to false flag attacks, see this next video. Gulf of Tonkin is discussed. Then we will meet a USS Liberty survivor and hero whistle blower, with new information.

Richard Larry Weaver, who was on the deck of the Liberty when it was attacked almost 50 years ago, has suffered 34 surgeries and still has 60 pieces of shrapnel in his body. He has been in pain for almost 50 years. The Veterans Administration tried to deny him benefits, and changed his paperwork to deny he was ever on the Liberty. He had to fight for any help he got. Through his own investigation, Larry discovered that the submarine USS Amberjack fired the torpedo that hit the Liberty, not an Israeli torpedo boat. You will hear his testimony below. Only 2000 people had seen the youtube below, before I posted this. If you have been in the military or know someone who has, I ask you please to share this post with everyone you know. We have to ask, who are we serving?

Just as the Gulf of Tonkin incident was falsified so that Johnson could declare war on North Vietnam, a false flag attack on the Liberty was going to be blamed on Egypt. It is most likely that the attack was run by an international group who controlled both the USA and Israel. Five years later, the Bilderberg Group discussed what to do with the glut of petro dollars which Saudi Arabia would need to invest somewhere. They had this discussion 5 months before the price went up! The Bilderberg group was in on the plan for the 1967 Yum Kipper war and the price increase. Did they plan the 1967 attack on the Liberty? What we know for sure is that the U.S. and Israel acted together, not separately that infamous day, and to blame Israel alone is naive. It would also be naive to think that Johnson wanted a war with Vietnam on his own, or that he wanted a war with Egypt on his own. The international bankers created UN, Israel, the FED. Who told Johnson what to do that day?

The first photo to right is the injured US seamen after the June 8, 1967 attack on the USS Liberty. The injured man in foreground is Richard Larry Weaver. In second photo below is Larry on Maui with author Ray Songtree three years ago. Please listen to Larrys account of what happened the day of the attack and his later investigation in youtube below. Thanks to website Federal Jack for producing this youtube. See link. Here is another interpretation of what happened that day.

Veterans need to ask. Is one really a hero to serve treasonous liars? At what point since the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin Incident, which was excuse to kill 3 million people in Southeast Asia, has our government ever become honest?

Is it patriotism to serve a flag run secretly by Globalists who care about nothing but their own power? Is it patriotism to be cannon fodder or to live with guilt the rest of your life? There are 22 veterans every day killing themselves because they know they were not heroes and saw and did things they cannot be proud of. Who are we serving? It is time to ask questions. It is time to be very brave, like Larry, and find out the truth.

Next, the testimony of Richard Larry Weaver. Here he discusses the USS Amberjack torpedo. Links to two more interviews below.

Second interview with Larry Weaver here. First 10 minutes is repeat, then new material.

Interview with another USS Liberty survivor Ernie Gallo.

Israeli Pilot Speaks Up

http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0693/9306019.htm

Fifteen years after the attack, an Israeli pilot approached Liberty survivors and then held extensive interviews with former Congressman Paul N. (Pete) McCloskey about his role. According to this senior Israeli lead pilot, he recognized the Liberty as American immediately, so informed his headquarters, and was told to ignore the American flag and continue his attack. He refused to do so and returned to base, where he was arrested.Later, a dual-citizen Israeli major told survivors that he was in an Israeli war room where he heard that pilots radio report. The attacking pilots and everyone in the Israeli war room knew that they were attacking an American ship, the major said. He recanted the statement only after he received threatening phone calls from Israel.

The pilots protests also were heard by radio monitors in the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon. Then-U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Dwight Porter has confirmed this. Porter told his story to syndicated columnists Rowland Evans and Robert Novak and offered to submit to further questioning by authorities. Unfortunately, no one in the U.S. government has any interest in hearing these first-person accounts of Israeli treachery.

Key members of the Lyndon Johnson administration have long agreed that this attack was no accident. Perhaps most outspoken is former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Thomas Moorer. I can never accept the claim that this was a mistaken attack, he insists. Former Secretary of State Dean Rusk is equally outspoken, calling the attack deliberate in press and radio interviews. Similarly strong language comes from top leaders of the Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency (some of whose personnel were among the victims), National Security Council, and from presidential advisers such as Clark Clifford, Joseph Califano and Lucius Battle.

A top-secret analysis of Israels excuse conducted by the Department of State found Israels story to be untrue. Yet Israel and its defenders continue to stand by their claim that the attack was a tragic accident in which Israel mistook the most modern electronic surveillance vessel in the world for a rusted-out 40-year-old Egyptian horse transport. Despite the evidence, no U.S. administration has never found the courage to defy the Israeli lobby by publicly demanding a proper accounting from Israel.

**********

Remember, the USS Amberjack fired the torpedo. Israel will never admit anything because Israel works for the same Globalists that Johnson worked for. They have already said their torpedoes missed.

The rest is here:

1967: USS Liberty attacked by submarine USS Amberjack Crew …

Fair Usage Law

December 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: USS Liberty  Comments Closed

Twitter Bars Milo Yiannopoulos in Wake of Leslie Joness …

SAN FRANCISCO For years, one of the main grievances among Twitter users has been the ability of anonymous trolls to send abusive comments to other people on the service. But on Tuesday, Twitter barred one of the most egregious and consistent offenders of its terms of service, Milo Yiannopoulos, in an attempt to show that it is cracking down on abuse. The ban against Mr. Yiannopoulos, a technology editor at the conservative news site Breitbart and known by his Twitter handle, @Nero, follows a campaign of prolonged abuse against Leslie Jones, a comedian and co-star of the recently released Ghostbusters movie. The film and its stars have come under fire from various parts of the internet for months, after it was first revealed that the reboot of the 1984 film would feature an all-female cast. Ms. Jones in particular has borne the brunt of the online abuse in recent days, especially since the release of Ghostbusters in the United States on Friday. Hundreds of anonymous Twitter commenters hurled racist and sexist remarks at the stars Twitter account, rallied and directed by Mr. Yiannopoulos this week. The news media picked up on the abuse after Ms. Jones began retweeting screenshots of the litany of comments sent to her over the past few days. On Monday evening, Ms. Jones quit using Twitter with a final message of exasperation after days of near-nonstop abuse. I leave Twitter tonight with tears and a very sad heart, Ms. Jones tweeted. All this cause I did a movie. In a statement, a Twitter spokesman said: People should be able to express diverse opinions and beliefs on Twitter. But no one deserves to be subjected to targeted abuse online, and our rules prohibit inciting or engaging in the targeted abuse or harassment of others. Twitter did not comment directly on Mr. Yiannopouloss account or actions of the past 48 hours, but the spokesman said over that period, Weve seen an uptick in the number of accounts violating these policies and have taken enforcement actions against these accounts, ranging from warnings that also require the deletion of tweets violating our policies to permanent suspension. In a brief interview on Tuesday evening, Mr. Yiannopoulos said, This is the beginning of the end for Twitter. Some people are going to find this perfectly acceptable, he said. Anyone who believes in free speech or is a conservative certainly will not. The move stops short of providing Twitters 300-million-plus users with effective tools to combat trolls and abuse on a much larger scale, an issue that celebrities and everyday users alike deal with on a regular basis. In the past, Twitter, the San Francisco-based social media company, has faced criticism for its handling of the so-called GamerGate controversy, as women in the gaming community were increasingly harassed on Twitter often to the point of receiving death threats in the wake of a dispute in the online gaming community. Twitter has said that dealing with abuse and trust and safety issues is one of its top priorities, though it has not detailed how it will handle the issues in the future. We know many people believe we have not done enough to curb this type of behavior on Twitter, the company said in a statement. We agree. Twitter said it is investing in improving its tools and enforcement systems, and is in the process of reviewing its hateful conduct policies to prohibit additional types of abusive behavior and allow more types of reporting, with the goal of reducing the burden on the person being targeted, according to a statement. Twitter said it expected to detail more of that in the coming weeks.

Fair Usage Law

December 12, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Milo Yiannopoulos  Comments Closed

#Apartheid hashtag on Twitter

@IDF An article on how the #IDF murdered Palestinian during “violent clash”. Killing a disabled man who was calmly walking away…..As usual, justice will only be served the day this #apartheid regime is brought down, for in your eyes, any murderer of an Arab is a hero.

Fair Usage Law

December 11, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Apartheid  Comments Closed

How to pronounce apartheid: HowToPronounce.com

Rate How Difficult to Pronounce this word Very Easy Easy Moderate Difficult Extremely Difficult Thanks for your vote! 1 Meaning, 5 Sentences and 1 Another word found for apartheid. apartheid Translate not foundIf you know the Translate of this word, share it. 2.Melanie Verwoerd, 47, Was Born Into An Afrikaner Family At The Height Of apartheid And Married The Grandson Of Its Architect Before Joining The Anc 3.Missouri Racial Violence Recalls apartheid, U.n. Rights Chief Says 4.’apartheid Is Flourishing’ In Us, Says Un High Commissioner For Human Rights 5.Crime Against Humanity: What Makes Israel An apartheid Regime apartheid Antonyms not foundIf you know the Antonyms of this word, share it.

Fair Usage Law

December 11, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Apartheid  Comments Closed

Martin Luther King Day 2019, 2020 and further – 2018 Calendar

View below the dates for (among others) Martin Luther King Day 2019 and Martin Luther King Day 2020. You can also see on which day the holiday falls and how many days it is until this holiday. DateHolidayDayWeek numberDays to goJanuary 15, 2018 Martin Luther King Day 2018 Monday 3 -January 21, 2019 Martin Luther King Day 2019 Monday 4 41January 20, 2020 Martin Luther King Day 2020 Monday 4 405January 18, 2021 Martin Luther King Day 2021 Monday 3 769January 17, 2022 Martin Luther King Day 2022 Monday 3 1133January 16, 2023 Martin Luther King Day 2023 Monday 3 1497January 15, 2024 Martin Luther King Day 2024 Monday 3 1861January 20, 2025 Martin Luther King Day 2025 Monday 4 2232January 19, 2026 Martin Luther King Day 2026 Monday 4 2596January 18, 2027 Martin Luther King Day 2027 Monday 3 2960January 17, 2028 Martin Luther King Day 2028 Monday 3 3324Significance of Martin Luther King Day 2019 (Jr.)Martin Luther King Day 2019 is an annual federal American holiday that celebrates the birthday of Martin Luther King Jr. (January 15). It celebrates the life and achievements of this influential American civil rights leader. History of Martin Luther King DayThe idea of Martin Luther King Day 2019 as a holiday was promoted soon after his assassination in 1968. After King’s death, United States Democrat Representative, John Conyers and, United State Republican Senator, Edward Brooke introduced a bill in Congress to make King’s birthday a national holiday. The bill first came to a vote in the United States House of Representatives in 1979 and fell five votes short of the number needed. There were two main arguments mentioned by opponents, the first being that a paid holiday for federal employees would be too expensive and, secondly, that a holiday to honour the birth (of a private citizen who had never held public office) would be contrary to the longstanding tradition. The effort received more publicity when, after a decade, shortly after the failure of a bill that was introduced by Representative John Conyers. In September of 1979, Stevie Wonder released a song called “Happy Birthday”. That was meant to make a case for the holiday, calling out anyone who didn’t support the idea. Additionally, Six million signatures were collected for a petition to Congress to pass the law. In 1981, President Ronald Reagan came into office and originally opposed the holiday. Additionally, Senators, of North Carolina Republicans, Jesse Helms and John Porter East opposed the holiday and questioned whether King was important enough to receive such an honour and criticized King’s opposition to the Vietnam War. On November 2, 1983, Reagan signed a bill, proposed by Representative Katie Hall of Indiana, to create a federal holiday honouring King. The bill passed the House of Representatives and was observed for the first time on January 20, 1986. Initially, some states resisted observing the holiday only in the year 2000 was it officially observed in all 50 states for the first time. Some schools celebrate the day by teaching their pupils or students about the work of Martin Luther King and the struggle against racial segregation and racism. In recent years it is encouraged that Americans to give some of their time on this day as volunteers in citizen action groups. Share this page on Facebook! Link to Calendar-365.com – Place on your website or blog:

Fair Usage Law

December 11, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Martin Luther King  Comments Closed

Scoptophilia: Rosario Gallardo – Indoor and outdoor

Rosario Gallardo is not the husband of an exhibitionist lady but the lady helped to exhibit by her husband. They are Italians, from Milan, but seem to be quite often in Barcelona. Their work is marked by a sense of anarchist approach and the term pornoguerilla is without any ambiguity. There’s a part of happenings in this work (see her orgasm via masturbation in a gallery of art here) but also a marital complicity (in a certain way the same than Catherine Millet and her husband except here there’s not explicit sex action with other partners). I really love the impression of liberty, happy transgression, body freedom, ease with physiological functions such as peeing, jubilation to show the most hidden or aesthetically arranged intimate parts of our bodies. Yes, it’s a kind of heaven to live this in a male-female (or female-female like Lexo) love story. And more than the artistic, anarchist and conjugal qualities, it has surely a social function to extricate people from their moral and sexless, guilt-irrigated approach of body. Her site here. An interview (in Italian) there. A blog there.

Fair Usage Law

December 11, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Israel  Comments Closed

Quo Vadis Vatican? Jewish involvement in the radical changes of the Second Vatican Council

Add New Here’s to our murder-less mystery story, where its religious-ecclesiastical background calls for careful threading, though no issues of faith or belief are involved. I am referring to the Second Vatican Council, (1961–1964), some of its deliberations, the shadowy maneuvers that brought them about, and the implications and consequences for the brethren and the […]

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Occidental Observer  Comments Closed

Americas Jewish left endorses anti-Jewish discrimination …

Stephen M. Flatow, an attorney in New Jersey, is the father of Alisa Flatow, who was murdered in an Iranian-sponsored Palestinian terrorist attack in 1995. His book, A Fathers Story: My Fight for Justice Against Iranian Terror, has just been published. American Jewish peace activists who have spent much of their lives fighting discrimination against ethnic minorities, have decided there is one form of discrimination they support: discrimination against Jews who reside in Judea-Samaria. I am referring to the open letter about the Airbnb controversy that was issued on December 4 by the New Israel Fund, J Street, Americans for Peace Now, Truah, and Partners for Progressive Israel. Airbnb announced that it will remove listings in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank that are at the core of the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians. If Airbnb had removed listings from all communities in that region, that would not be discriminatory. But thats not what it did. Airbnb removed listings only from Israeli (read: Jewish) communities. Arab settlements were not affected. To appreciate what Airbnb has done, consider the case of the city of Hevron. Some of its Palestinian Arab residents illegally occupy homes that were stolen from Jews during the 1929 pogrom. Deeds exist proving that. Such Palestinian settlements in Hebron are certainly part of the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians. Not only did the Jewish leftwing Gang of Five defend Airbnb in their open letter, but they proceeded to formally delegitimize every Jewish community in Judea-Samaria.But Airbnb is still doing business with them. And what about illegal Palestinian Arab settlements in Shechem, better known as Nablus? Until the 1930s, there was a large and thriving Jewish community there. Today there is not a single Jewish resident in Shechem. Wonder what ever happened to them? Arab pogromists drove them out and took their homes. Airbnb apparently has no problem with that. And neither, it seems, do the New Israel Fund, J Street, et al. Not only did the Jewish leftwing Gang of Five defend Airbnb in their open letter, but they proceeded to formally delegitimize every Jewish community in Judea-Samaria. Airbnbs de-listings will only occur in illegitimate West Bank settlements, the Gang of Five asserted. Airbnb objects to the settlements not because they are Jewish but because they usurp Palestinian land. The claim that every Jewish community in the territories is illegitimate and usurps Palestinian land is, of course, a vicious lie. It echoes the longtime Arab propaganda argument that Jews have no valid religious, historic, or legal connection to Judea and Samariathe territories that have been the heart of the national Jewish homeland for 3,000 years. In the view of these five groups, every inch of Judea and Samaria is Palestinian land, and any Jew who lives there is an usurper who deserves to be boycotted, treated as a pariah, and eventually driven out. Obviously if Jewish leftwing groups choose to support anti-Jewish discriminationby boycotting only Jewish settlements and not Arab onesthat is their right according the U.S. Constitution. And if these groups want to advocate that every inch of Judea and Samaria is usurped Palestinian land, that, too, is their right. But that does not mean the organized American Jewish community has to treat such racist positions as legitimate. The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organization overwhelmingly rejected J Streets application for membership several years ago. That was a wise move. Jewish umbrella groups that have relationships with the New Israel Fund and the other members of the Gang of Five should reconsider whether they want to maintain those relationships. Partners for Progressive Israel (PPI), for example, is a member of the American Zionist Movement. Its fair to ask whether PPIs support for discrimination against Israeli Jews is consistent with the AZMs declared mission is to strengthen the connection of American Jews with Israel; develop their appreciation of the centrality of Israel to Jewish life worldwide; deepen their understanding of Israeli society and the challenges it faces; encourage travel, long-term visits and Aliyah to Israel; and to facilitate dialogue, debate and collective action to further Zionism in the United States and abroad. Is advocating discrimination against Jews in Judea-Samaria consistent with the AZMs mission statement? Free speech is a sacred principle. I would never advocate that any point of view should be suppressed or prohibited. At the same time, Jewish umbrella organizations have no obligation to embrace those whose activities conflict with the umbrella groups declared mission. Refraining from such an embrace would not impinge on the radicals right or ability to say what they want. It would simply mean not conferring Jewish communal legitimacy upon those who are now promoting discrimination against some Jews.

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Anti-Jewish  Comments Closed

Marcion – Anti-Jewish | Christian Forums

Evidence of his influence is still seen. Click to expand… Thankfully, theology itself in the Early Church doesn’t lend itself to the idea to assume that anything pertaining to the OT was automatically within the negative and only that within the NT was good. For the heresy of Marcionism tried to divorce the God of the OT from the God of the NT in a false scenario …but the Early Church valued OT practice (more shared here, here, here) and thankfully combated him… And even outside of Marcionism, there were others promoting the spirit of lawlessness whenever they would try to add on to what God commanded of believers in the New Covenant and say that it was a matter of keeping the Law – for in doing so, that’d be a matter of sin. This is what the Ebionites (certain camps of them, specifically) were guilty of opposite of Marcion when they advocated the keeping of all aspects of the OT in order to avoid being lawless as they saw it….for going past what Yeshua noted and what God promoted is what lawlessness is about…..and lawlessness was never about not following all things solely in Mosaic code. When God gave different laws to different groups, that was the Law they were to be for – and to go back to a previous system of law was disobedience in itself – as well as promoting the wrong law. 1 John 3:4 [ Sin and the Child of God ] Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness.5 And you know that He was manifested to take away our sins, and in Him there is no sin. Click to expand… Sin is what lawlessness is defined by – not systems of law given at one time or another. To those under the Law of Moses, to go past that was SIN – and at the same time, there were others not bound by the Mosaic Law (like Jethro of Midian and others like Noah ) who were given differing requirements/laws (as the Gentiles were outside of Israel ) and to not be faithful to that was SIN – for them. And likewise, in Matthew 7, many quote that saying “That’s the way Yeshua will speak to the Gentiles since they were lawless (i.e. not under Mosaic Code!!!”) yet the context is one where he was speaking primarily to a Jewish audience – warning them of false prophets who were doing many things that were approved of/asked by the Lord…but it wasn’t His HEART nor was it His Will for them. There’s an excellent paper on the issue elsewhere if interested – as it address the Anti-Semitism present in Marcionism and other systems that developed to combat it and yet went in other directions. ..for the paper explores Ebionism and Marcionism, two early church heresies which depict the two most antithetical forms of the Judaism-OT and Christianity-NT breach in early Christianity. It addresses Ebionism’s philo-Semitlism and Marcionism’s chagrin for the Jewish roots of Christianity – both shown to be antecedents to certain contemporary heretical conceptions …and both having a corrective found in Paul’s metaphor of God’s revelatiory-redemptive olive tree (Romans 1/:/7-24) which aptly describes the dual necessity of the root and the branches, that is the Old and New Testaments.

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Anti-Jewish  Comments Closed

1967: USS Liberty attacked by submarine USS Amberjack Crew …

1967: USS Liberty attacked by submarine USS Amberjack Crew member blows whistle https://lipstick-and-war-crimes.org/1967-uss-liberty-attacked-by-submarine-uss-amberjack-crew-member-blows-whistle/ compilation by Ray Songtree Most accounts of the attack on the USS Liberty off the coast of Gaza in 1967 blame the Israelis.Then President Johnson is blamed for abandoning the ship, in order to not embarrass ally Israel for its mistake. However, Johnson is quoted as saying I want that goddamn ship going to the bottom! No help, recall the Wings. He did not just say, stay away, he stated his intention. He wanted the ship to be sunk. The submarine USS Amberjack had escorted the Liberty all the way from West Africa. The Amberjack saw everything that happened, but did not aid the Liberty at all. Also recall that just three years before , the USS Maddox was NOT attacked in Gulf of Tonkin, but U.S. declared war on North Vietnam using the controlled media, claiming there was an attack. For an 8 minute synopsis of what happened on June 8, 1967 and an introduction to false flag attacks, see this next video. Gulf of Tonkin is discussed. Then we will meet a USS Liberty survivor and hero whistle blower, with new information. Richard Larry Weaver, who was on the deck of the Liberty when it was attacked almost 50 years ago, has suffered 34 surgeries and still has 60 pieces of shrapnel in his body. He has been in pain for almost 50 years. The Veterans Administration tried to deny him benefits, and changed his paperwork to deny he was ever on the Liberty. He had to fight for any help he got. Through his own investigation, Larry discovered that the submarine USS Amberjack fired the torpedo that hit the Liberty, not an Israeli torpedo boat. You will hear his testimony below. Only 2000 people had seen the youtube below, before I posted this. If you have been in the military or know someone who has, I ask you please to share this post with everyone you know. We have to ask, who are we serving? Just as the Gulf of Tonkin incident was falsified so that Johnson could declare war on North Vietnam, a false flag attack on the Liberty was going to be blamed on Egypt. It is most likely that the attack was run by an international group who controlled both the USA and Israel. Five years later, the Bilderberg Group discussed what to do with the glut of petro dollars which Saudi Arabia would need to invest somewhere. They had this discussion 5 months before the price went up! The Bilderberg group was in on the plan for the 1967 Yum Kipper war and the price increase. Did they plan the 1967 attack on the Liberty? What we know for sure is that the U.S. and Israel acted together, not separately that infamous day, and to blame Israel alone is naive. It would also be naive to think that Johnson wanted a war with Vietnam on his own, or that he wanted a war with Egypt on his own. The international bankers created UN, Israel, the FED. Who told Johnson what to do that day? The first photo to right is the injured US seamen after the June 8, 1967 attack on the USS Liberty. The injured man in foreground is Richard Larry Weaver. In second photo below is Larry on Maui with author Ray Songtree three years ago. Please listen to Larrys account of what happened the day of the attack and his later investigation in youtube below. Thanks to website Federal Jack for producing this youtube. See link. Here is another interpretation of what happened that day. Veterans need to ask. Is one really a hero to serve treasonous liars? At what point since the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin Incident, which was excuse to kill 3 million people in Southeast Asia, has our government ever become honest? Is it patriotism to serve a flag run secretly by Globalists who care about nothing but their own power? Is it patriotism to be cannon fodder or to live with guilt the rest of your life? There are 22 veterans every day killing themselves because they know they were not heroes and saw and did things they cannot be proud of. Who are we serving? It is time to ask questions. It is time to be very brave, like Larry, and find out the truth. Next, the testimony of Richard Larry Weaver. Here he discusses the USS Amberjack torpedo. Links to two more interviews below. Second interview with Larry Weaver here. First 10 minutes is repeat, then new material. Interview with another USS Liberty survivor Ernie Gallo. Israeli Pilot Speaks Up http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0693/9306019.htm Fifteen years after the attack, an Israeli pilot approached Liberty survivors and then held extensive interviews with former Congressman Paul N. (Pete) McCloskey about his role. According to this senior Israeli lead pilot, he recognized the Liberty as American immediately, so informed his headquarters, and was told to ignore the American flag and continue his attack. He refused to do so and returned to base, where he was arrested.Later, a dual-citizen Israeli major told survivors that he was in an Israeli war room where he heard that pilots radio report. The attacking pilots and everyone in the Israeli war room knew that they were attacking an American ship, the major said. He recanted the statement only after he received threatening phone calls from Israel. The pilots protests also were heard by radio monitors in the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon. Then-U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Dwight Porter has confirmed this. Porter told his story to syndicated columnists Rowland Evans and Robert Novak and offered to submit to further questioning by authorities. Unfortunately, no one in the U.S. government has any interest in hearing these first-person accounts of Israeli treachery. Key members of the Lyndon Johnson administration have long agreed that this attack was no accident. Perhaps most outspoken is former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Thomas Moorer. I can never accept the claim that this was a mistaken attack, he insists. Former Secretary of State Dean Rusk is equally outspoken, calling the attack deliberate in press and radio interviews. Similarly strong language comes from top leaders of the Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency (some of whose personnel were among the victims), National Security Council, and from presidential advisers such as Clark Clifford, Joseph Califano and Lucius Battle. A top-secret analysis of Israels excuse conducted by the Department of State found Israels story to be untrue. Yet Israel and its defenders continue to stand by their claim that the attack was a tragic accident in which Israel mistook the most modern electronic surveillance vessel in the world for a rusted-out 40-year-old Egyptian horse transport. Despite the evidence, no U.S. administration has never found the courage to defy the Israeli lobby by publicly demanding a proper accounting from Israel. ********** Remember, the USS Amberjack fired the torpedo. Israel will never admit anything because Israel works for the same Globalists that Johnson worked for. They have already said their torpedoes missed.

Fair Usage Law

December 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: USS Liberty  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."