Tragedy Gives The Hoodie A Whole New Meaning : NPR

James Gilchrist of Orlando, Fla., attends a rally for slain teenager Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Fla., on Thursday. Trayvon was wearing a hoodie when he was shot. Roberto Gonzalez/AP hide caption

James Gilchrist of Orlando, Fla., attends a rally for slain teenager Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Fla., on Thursday. Trayvon was wearing a hoodie when he was shot.

From the tragic death of Trayvon Martin, a symbol emerges: the hoodie.

A simple hooded sweatshirt has become emblematic of certain assumptions in America. And of a desire by many to overturn those assumptions.

To a neighborhood watch volunteer in a Sanford, Fla., gated community, the young man in “a dark hoodie, a gray hoodie” was a “suspicious guy.” That’s what George Zimmerman told the 911 dispatcher before he shot and killed the 17-year-old. Zimmerman, 28, says he acted in self-defense; he has not been charged with a crime.

On Friday, Geraldo Rivera said on the Fox & Friends TV show that “the hoodie is as much responsible for Trayvon Martin’s death as George Zimmerman was.” Rivera warned parents not to let their children wear hoodies unless it is raining or they are at a track-and-field event. He said it sends a sinister signal.

“You cannot rehabilitate the hoodie,” Rivera said. “Stop wearing it.”

But supporters of Martin and his family are saying the opposite. As a sign of solidarity, a number of Americans are donning hoodies and marching. “We are all … Trayvon Martin,” they chant. Hundreds of supporters walked in a Million Hoodie March in New York earlier in the week. On Saturday, another group plans to rally in Washington, and gatherings have been scheduled for other cities, too.

On Facebook, Twitter and other sites, folks are posting self-portraits with hoodies as a call for justice in the Martin case. The Miami Heat basketball team posed in hoodies. So did Marian Wright Edelman of the Children’s Defense Fund and former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm. “The hoodie is a way of expressing support for the Martin family,” Granholm says in an email, “and for all the sons of African American families who bear the heavy burden of other people’s negative assumptions.”

And so the hoodie, considered by some to be suspicious attire and by others to be benign, becomes a wearable Rorschach of contemporary American culture.

A Pair Of Hoods: Eminem and Mark Zuckerberg

It’s tough to find an American closet that doesn’t have a hoodie hanging there. Send a search engine out into the ether seeking images of people wearing hoodies, and it will bring home photos of tastemaking celebrities Selena Gomez, Rihanna, Zac Efron, Avril Lavigne, Bill Cosby, Muhammad Ali and many others, as well as various athletes, college kids, blue-collar workers and, yes, criminals.

When Eminem appeared at South By Southwest recently, he was wearing a hoodie. Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook fame often rocks a hoodie. So does Christina Aguilera.

Miami Heat players wear team hoodies in this image posted to LeBron James’ Twitter page. NBA stars Dwyane Wade and James decided Thursday to make their reactions to Trayvon’s death public. Lebron James via Twitter/AP hide caption

Miami Heat players wear team hoodies in this image posted to LeBron James’ Twitter page. NBA stars Dwyane Wade and James decided Thursday to make their reactions to Trayvon’s death public.

Some hoodies have zippers, some have drawstrings, all have the cowl-like hoods. And it is the hood providing a shadowy cave for the face that makes the sweatshirt distinct. Hooded figures, from the innocent Little Red Riding Hood we meet as children to the Grim Reaper we meet later, strike an ancient chord within us.

“The hoodie has had a long and tortured history,” Elizabeth Flock writes in The Washington Post. She traces the present-day look back to medieval monks. When they were introduced into American fashion, hoodies were worn mostly by laborers as protection from the cold. Boxers wore hoodies; so did blue-collar workers.

Margaret Atwood’s classic 1985 novel, The Handmaid’s Tale, had a very striking figure on the cover, wearing a hood a key signifier of oppressed women in the story.

If the hoodie catches on as symbolic of an issue, it will not be the first time that a movement has adopted a recognizable representation.

Scores of organizations in this country and elsewhere use ribbons, pins, buttons and bracelets to help supporters identify each other.

Remember Rocky?

There are many examples of clothing being used as a symbol throughout American history, says Joshua I. Miller, a professor at Lafayette College in Easton, Pa., who has written about the politics of fashion. “The dress in Mad Men, now ubiquitous, symbolizes cultural trends in white suburban America in the ’50s and early ’60s.”

And perceptions of clothes can change.

Former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm is one of a handful of celebrities who’ve donned hoodies in support of Trayvon’s family. AP/Current TV hide caption

Former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm is one of a handful of celebrities who’ve donned hoodies in support of Trayvon’s family.

In fact, Michael Thomas Mills, a semiotician at the University of Northern Colorado, says that he first recalls hoodies popping up in positive ways, such as when the fictional boxer Rocky and other athletes-in-training wore them.

But Mills says hoodies have been used by various groups as shorthand for ominous behavior. Hooded sweatshirts often suggest “negative and damaging stereotypes,” Mills says, “and are so prevalent in the media that many individuals, especially those not from urban settings or where there is not much ethnic diversity, learn through the media to associate the clothing with a type of individual or situation.”

He says the depiction is frequently trotted out, for instance, in ads for home security systems. “Often hoodies will be used to suggest sinister motives,” Mills says, “usually with the perpetrator pulling the hoodie over his head before entering a house.”

Mills cites another sartorial metamorphosis: The classic sweater thrown over the shoulders and tied at the chest has long been associated with country clubs, wealth and influence, Mills says, but now the look is “usually a negative sign about elitism.”

Bluejeans, once seen as Western working wear, became the chosen pants of ’60s protests. Now bluejeans are so accepted that presidential candidates wear them on the campaign trail.

And so, people wearing hoodies to honor Trayvon Martin are trying to turn the negativity toward hoodies inside out.

Could such a sea change possibly work? Could it be the more that different kinds of people wear hoodies, the less the sweatshirts will be revolting to the Geraldo Riveras of the world? Could the Wear-a-Hoodie Movement really alter the way that some Americans look at other Americans? And, one last question, could a sweatshirt designed to enclose and envelop be a catalyst for more openness and more meaningful dialogue?

Read the rest here:

Tragedy Gives The Hoodie A Whole New Meaning : NPR

Related Post

January 2, 2018   Posted in: Trayvon Martin |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."