Letter Have we forgotten the reasons behind World War II? – Petoskey News-Review

Have we forgotten the reasons behind World War II?

Editor:

I read with interest the recent article proudly proclaiming that Petoskey is now considered one of the safest towns in Michigan, even as I watched on TV surreal scenes of street violence from last weekend’s events in Virginia, followed by our president’s multiple attempts to responsibly comment regarding the same. His failure to do anything more than suggest false moral equivalencies between vilely chanting, torch-bearing white supremacists (“who at least had a permit … and just wanted to save a statue”), and those he condemned as “very violent alt-left” demonstrators who opposed the openly-fascist haters, should be cause for great concern among all citizens of our shared Union.

Was World War II so long ago that too many of us cannot now remember (or never learned) the good reasons for why we went to war? Some who in blind pursuit of conservative agendas held their noses while voting for the greatly flawed Mr. Trump in last year’s election, did so with full knowledge of his erratic views and behavior. Now, however, we’re seeing that his latent, thinly veiled racism can be dangerous by spreading hatred across our beloved land. I, for one, but not alone, can state unequivocally that I’d rather live in a place that is not only “safe,” but which rejects such racism in favor of equality and justice for ALL people.

Thank you for considering my views.

Frank W. Hawthorne

Petoskey

Read the original here:

Letter Have we forgotten the reasons behind World War II? – Petoskey News-Review

Related Post

August 22, 2017   Posted in: World War II |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."