US Won World War II by Bombing Japan and Then Making Its Own Soldiers Sick From Nuclear Cleanup Duty – Newsweek

Newsweekpublished this story under the headline of A-Bomb Veterans: A Plea for Help on November 26, 1979. Due to World War II Veteransdenouncing emerging neo-Nazi groups,Newsweekis republishing the story.

“Nobody told us anything about radiation,” says 59-year-old Harry Coppola, who was one of the servicemen sent into Hiroshima and Nagasaki for cleanup operations after the bombings in 1945. The former marine is dying of a rare form of bone-marrow cancer called multiple myeloma, and he and otherveteranswith serious health problems claim that their illnesses stem from exposure to radiation. They are pressuring the Federal government to pick up the tab for their outstanding medical bills.

The cleanup operations involved an estimated 1,000 servicemen. The government has never issued a list of the personnel, but groups like the Committee for U.S.Veteransof Hiroshima & Nagasaki have located 200 of them. Of these, 41 have been stricken with leukemia, bone-marrow cancer or rare blood diseases. Dr. Stephen Chandler, a hematologist, says that these man “are showing up with blood disorders far in excess of the average for their age group.” And Dr. Karen Steingart, a physician doing research on radiation effects, notes that the incidence of multiple myeloma is “at least four times that expected in the general population.”

‘COVER-UP’: So far, theVeteransAdministration has received more than 50 claimsand rejected them all. There is no evidence, argues the VA, that radiation actually caused the illnesses. The Defense Nuclear Agency (DNA) says that no serviceman was exposed to more than 1 rem during the entire ten months of the American occupationfar less than the nuclear industry’s current safety standard of 3 rems in a three-month period.

Daily Emails and Alerts – Get the best of Newsweek delivered to your inbox

“These guys are getting old enough so that they’re just getting sick from being on the good old earth,” says a DNA spokesman. “Somebody has convinced them to blame it on radiation.” But Virginia Ralph, whose ex-marine husband died of multiple myeloma last year, says that the government is “stonewalling. It’s a great cover-up. They’re afraid to admit anything, because then people who are living near nuclear reactors would worry that 30 years from now the same thing will happen.”

‘TOO LATE’: Coppola’s doctors have given him six months to live, and he remains bitter that the government “refuses to admit that the Nagasaki bomb is killing me.” Coppola doesn’t know how he can continue to pay for his chemotherapy and blood transfusions. “I’ve already gone through my $29,000 in life savings,” he says, “and I owe everybody.” Congressman Edward Roybal of California has introduced a bill that would require the Federal government to pay for treatment for an illness or injury “which is directly attributable to the explosion of the atomic bombs.” Although eight similar bills have died in committee since 1972, Coppola hopes that the legislation will eventually pass. “Unfortunately,” he says, “it will be too late to help me.

World War II veteran Luke Gasparre salutes during the singing of the U.S. national anthem during a Purple Heart Reunited ceremony on Purple Heart Day in Manhattan, New York, August 7. World War II veterans have recently come forward to denounce neo-Nazi groups emerging after the events at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri

See the rest here:

US Won World War II by Bombing Japan and Then Making Its Own Soldiers Sick From Nuclear Cleanup Duty – Newsweek

Related Post

August 18, 2017   Posted in: World War II |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."