Charles Krauthammer Slams Trump’s Take On Charlottesville As ‘A Moral Disgrace’ – HuffPost

The syndicated columnist appeared aghast on Fox News Special Report when fellow panelist Laura Ingraham suggested that Trump had become sidetracked and caught in a pundit trap when he became defensive about his response to the weekends events in Virginia, instead of talking about the planned press conference topic of infrastructure.

To critique what he did today on the grounds that it distracts from the agenda or was a tactical mistake I believe is a cop-out,Krauthammer told Ingraham.What Trump did today was a moral disgrace.

What he did is he reverted back to where he was on Saturday, and made it very clear that what he read on …Monday, two days later, was a hostage tape, clearly reading off a prompter, saying these denunciations by name of the KKK, et cetera, he continued.

That wasnt Trump speaking. That was the aides speaking.

At Trump Tower earlier Tuesday, Trump defended his initial statement on the Charlottesville riots and once again placed the blame on both sides of the conflict.

Krauthammer argued that Trumps off-script press conference revealed the presidents true feelings, though Ingraham argued that Trump had already responded to the hate groups on Monday.

Ill tell you why he didnt [denounce white supremacy]on Saturday, because its not whats in his heart, he said, adding that his Monday statement condemning Nazis and the KKK was read off a prompter.

He was not asked to do the press conference.The reason he did it [is because] he has a point to make, Krauthammer added. And he made it very plain to the country that what he believes [is]what he said on Saturday and not what he read two days later.

Watch Krauthammer and Ingrahams full discussion in the video below.

The Morning Email

Wake up to the day’s most important news.

Go here to see the original:

Charles Krauthammer Slams Trump’s Take On Charlottesville As ‘A Moral Disgrace’ – HuffPost

Related Post

August 16, 2017   Posted in: Charles Krauthammer |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."