Egypt Bombing on Ominous Anniversary

Amru Salahuddien / Xinhua Press / Corbis

A woman cries near the blast site in front of a police headquarters in Cairo, Jan. 24. 2014 .

From outside Egypt, it seems clear enough: A massive car bomb exploded outside Cairo police headquarters on Friday and within hours a statement of responsibility was issued by Ansar Bait al-Maqdis, also known as Ansar Jerusalem, a militant group that takes its inspiration from al-Qaeda.

Inside Egypt, however, things were not clear at all. The car bomb as well as attacks on two other police stations in the Egyptian capital that left a total of five dead and 70 injured was widely viewed as the responsibility of the Muslim Brotherhood, the mothership of political Islam that in the space of six months last year moved from elected governing party of the most populous Arab state to being designated a terrorist organization.

Everyone is linking it to them, says Hussein Gohar, a senior official in the Egyptian Socialist Democratic Party, founded after the 2011 revolution as a liberal party, and polling well behind religious rivals in parliamentary elections. We are a party of reconciliation and concessions at the beginning. But as these things go on, its making it very difficult now to convince anyone the Brothers are not involved.

The blast, on the eve of the third anniversary of the start of the popular uprising in Tahrir Square that promised a newly democratic Egypt, instead amplified fears that the country was reverting to the terror of two decades earlier: In the 1980s and 1990s, Islamist extremists carried out waves of assassinations, bombings and mass shootings that destabilized politics, wrecked tourism, and provoked a stern response from the government then headed by President Hosni Mubarak.

But even in those dark days there were no truck bombs in the heart of Cairo. Obviously, were facing something new, Gohar says. People are very angry. You cant believe how angry.

The smoke of Friday mornings explosion sent a massive black cloud over downtown Cario, obscuring distinctions that many Egyptians ceased bothering to make after the last explosion, the Dec. 24 bombing of a police station that killed 15 people in the Nile Delta city of Mansoura. That attack was also claimed by Ansar Jerusalem, a group that outside experts know as a specific militant force. Based in the Sinai Peninsula, it is comprised of mostly Bedouins who have embraced a radical vision of Islam associated with al-Qaeda; it has carried out elaborate operations against Israel. After the July 3 overthrow of Brotherhood President Mohamed Morsi by the Egyptian military, the group stepped up attacks on police and military targets, and for the first time reached into mainland Egypt.

Both this group and the Brotherhood has the same goal, to make Egypt and then the whole Middle East an Islamic state, but they differ on the method of how to do that, says Aviv Oreg, former head of the Israeli militarys al-Qaeda desk. The Brotherhood does not support violence.

Thats been the groups consistent insistence since its creation 85 years ago in Egypt, even as prominent members turned to terror, including current al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri. But many Egyptians no longer believe the assurances, according to Gohar and other observers .In the first days after the July 3 coup, prominent Brothers warned of suicide bombings, warning that removing an elected government would channel frustration into violence.

Read the rest here:
Egypt Bombing on Ominous Anniversary

Related Post

January 24, 2014   Posted in: Egypt |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."