Dem Rep: Louis Farrakhan Is an ‘Outstanding Human Being’

Rep. Danny Davis (C) speaks while flanked by other members of the Congressional Black Caucus / Getty Images

BY: Alex GriswoldFebruary 7, 2018 10:26 am

A House Democrat on Tuesday defended having met with controversial activist and imam Louis Farrakhan, saying the Nation of Islam leader is an “outstanding human being.”

The Daily Caller askedRep. Danny Davis (D., Ill.) about the revelation that the black separatist leader met with the Congressional Black Caucus in 2005 and was photographed meeting future president Barack Obama during a 2006 CBC meeting.

“I personally know [Farrakhan]; Ive been to his home, done meetings, participated in events with him,” Davis responded.

“I dont regard Louis Farrakhan as an aberration or anything; I regard him as an outstanding human being who commands a following of individuals who are learned and articulate. And he plays a big role in the lives of thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of people,” he continued.

Farrakhan has been labeled a virulent anti-Semiteby organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center, which notes he “routinely accuses Jews of manipulating the U.S. government and controlling the levers of world power,” and has praised Adolf Hitler as a “very great man.”

Among other fringe beliefs, the black separatist believes 9/11 was a “false flag,” Jews were responsible for slavery, white people are subhumans created by the evil black scientist named Yakub, and that after the 2011 Japanese tsunami, “divine spaceships waiting to avenge black suffering would soon arrive.”

Read more here:

Dem Rep: Louis Farrakhan Is an ‘Outstanding Human Being’

Related Post

February 10, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Louis Farrakhan |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."