Netflix Wont Offer Louis Farrakhan Documentary – The New …

Netflix will not release a documentary celebrating the musical career of Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam who is notorious for his history of anti-Semitic comments.

It appeared that The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan: My Lifes Journey Through Music, would be available for streaming on Netflix on Aug. 1, according to a now-deleted Monday Twitter announcement from Mr. Farrakhans account. It read: On August 1st, watch the premiere of my music documentary My Lifes Journey Through Music on @netflix. The documentary also appeared on lists of coming programming for Netflix Britain. It did not appear on Netflix lists distributed in the United States, Australia or Canada.

The film was not actually supposed to be scheduled, but, because of an internal miscommunication, appeared to be on various platforms, a spokesperson for Netflix said in an email. The Netflix spokesperson would not provide further details on Netflixs relationship with the film.

Mr. Farrakhan and representatives for the Nation of Islam did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

In light of Mr. Farrakhans announcement, a number of Jewish organizations and people spoke out in media outlets and on Twitter, or said they reached out to Netflix directly. Rabbi Marvin Hier, the founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, an organization dedicated to fighting anti-Semitism, said he immediately called up the Netflix chief executive, Ted Sarandos, who told him that a glitch had occurred, and the movie would not be released.

Rabbi Hier said it would be terrible to give Mr. Farrakhan legitimacy on such a national level by streaming this documentary.

Documentaries should always be screened, Rabbi Hier said. But not by bigots and haters.

The biographical documentary, made in 2014 and originally titled Lets Change the World, according to The Final Call, the Nation of Islams newspaper, tells the story of Mr. Farrakhans foray into playing violin. A trailer for the documentary posted on Facebook shows scenes from the movie that try to reframe criticism of Mr. Farrakhan, labeling him as misunderstood.

Mr. Farrakhan has been watched by many since his ascent to his post as the leader of the Nation of Islam a black nationalist political and religious movement in the 1970s. He has been branded by the Anti-Defamation League as virtually synonymous with anti-Semitism. In February, he gave a speech at a Nation of Islam convention, where, among other subversive statements, he said Jews were responsible for all of this filth and degenerate behavior that Hollywood is putting out turning men into women and women into men.

In June, he lost his Twitter verification for posting a video in which he called Jews satanic.

Supporters of Mr. Farrakhan expressed dismay in multiple Facebook posts at Netflixs decision to cut his documentary, but to stream another one, KKK: The Fight for White Supremacy, which features members of the Ku Klux Klan speaking about their white supremacist ideology.

Organizations including Bnai Brith International (the oldest Jewish service organization in the world) and the World Jewish Congress (which represents various Jewish organizations in 100 countries around the world) expressed concern with the announcement of The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan: My Lifes Journey Through Music, and praised Netflixs decision to cut it.

Gary P. Saltzman, president of Bnai Brith International, and Daniel S. Mariaschin, the organizations chief executive, said in an email statement that they were incredulous when it appeared that a positive film about Mr. Farrakhan would stream on such a tremendous platform.

Broadcast and streaming platforms such as Netflix are under no obligation to carry a particular program, their statement said. They make choices every day on what to run and not run. Not running this promotion is the right decision.

More here:

Netflix Wont Offer Louis Farrakhan Documentary – The New …

Related Post

August 5, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Louis Farrakhan |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."