Holocaust-denier Behind Twitter Threats Gets Probation | Southern … – Southern Poverty Law Center

David Joseph Lenio, a 31-year-old self-described white nationalist who said his ideal job would be operating a human gas chamber, also must undergo mental health treatment and not go within 1,000 feet of schools or Jewish synagogues.

He was fined $1,000 and ordered to have no contact with Jonathan Hutson, a Maryland communications consultant who first brought Lenios Twitter threats to the attention of the FBI in 2015.

I dont think theres any place in society for the things that youre saying, Kent County Circuit Court Judge Mark Trusock said from the bench, telling Lenio he has some very serious mental health issues.

God forbid that you would ever act out some of these things, the judge said.

Lenio chose not to address the court or offer any public apology or explanation for his behavior at the sentencing hearing.

In June, a jury in Kent County, Michigan, found Lenio guilty of malicious use of a telecommunications service, a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail. He was found not guilty of two felony counts of aggravated stalking and using a computer to commit a crime.

Lenio, of Grand Rapids, Michigan, had served four months in jail after his arrest in February in his hometown.

You only talked about things that you wanted to do and I believe thats why the jury found you not guilty of the more serious charges, the judge told Lenio.

Lenio, an itinerant cook and son of a wealthy, influential Michigan banker, was initially arrested on Twitter-threat related charges in Flathead County, Montana, in 2015. But for unexplained reasons, the prosecutor there elected not to take the case to trial and deferred the criminal charges, allowing Lenio to return to his parents home in Grand Rapids.

Within weeks, he resumed firing off hate-filled, anti-Semitic tweets, asking at one point how much it would cost to buy a gun with enough ammunition to kill 99 school kids. In February he also tweeted that he would rather see 500 American Jews beheaded than to see one Holocaust denier spend five minutes in jail.

He also fired off tweets threatening Hutson. He tweeted that he was more full of hate and rage than ever and bent on revenge after serving five months in a Montana jail. Lenio was arrested in late February in Michigan on charges he used social media to terrorize, frighten, intimidate and harass Hutson in violation of the Montana court order.

Hutson reported Lenios threats and anti-Semitic tweets to Twitter, and he ultimately was banned from the social media platform.

Read more:

Holocaust-denier Behind Twitter Threats Gets Probation | Southern … – Southern Poverty Law Center

Related Post

August 19, 2017   Posted in: Southern Poverty Law Center |

Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."