Quo Vadis Vatican? Jewish involvement in the radical changes of the Second Vatican Council

Add New Here’s to our murder-less mystery story, where its religious-ecclesiastical background calls for careful threading, though no issues of faith or belief are involved. I am referring to the Second Vatican Council, (1961–1964), some of its deliberations, the shadowy maneuvers that brought them about, and the implications and consequences for the brethren and the […]

Continued here:

Quo Vadis Vatican? Jewish involvement in the radical changes of the Second Vatican Council

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Occidental Observer  Comments Closed

Americas Jewish left endorses anti-Jewish discrimination …

Stephen M. Flatow, an attorney in New Jersey, is the father of Alisa Flatow, who was murdered in an Iranian-sponsored Palestinian terrorist attack in 1995. His book, A Fathers Story: My Fight for Justice Against Iranian Terror, has just been published.

American Jewish peace activists who have spent much of their lives fighting discrimination against ethnic minorities, have decided there is one form of discrimination they support: discrimination against Jews who reside in Judea-Samaria.

I am referring to the open letter about the Airbnb controversy that was issued on December 4 by the New Israel Fund, J Street, Americans for Peace Now, Truah, and Partners for Progressive Israel.

Airbnb announced that it will remove listings in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank that are at the core of the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians.

If Airbnb had removed listings from all communities in that region, that would not be discriminatory. But thats not what it did. Airbnb removed listings only from Israeli (read: Jewish) communities. Arab settlements were not affected.

To appreciate what Airbnb has done, consider the case of the city of Hevron. Some of its Palestinian Arab residents illegally occupy homes that were stolen from Jews during the 1929 pogrom. Deeds exist proving that. Such Palestinian settlements in Hebron are certainly part of the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians. Not only did the Jewish leftwing Gang of Five defend Airbnb in their open letter, but they proceeded to formally delegitimize every Jewish community in Judea-Samaria.But Airbnb is still doing business with them.

And what about illegal Palestinian Arab settlements in Shechem, better known as Nablus? Until the 1930s, there was a large and thriving Jewish community there. Today there is not a single Jewish resident in Shechem. Wonder what ever happened to them? Arab pogromists drove them out and took their homes. Airbnb apparently has no problem with that.

And neither, it seems, do the New Israel Fund, J Street, et al. Not only did the Jewish leftwing Gang of Five defend Airbnb in their open letter, but they proceeded to formally delegitimize every Jewish community in Judea-Samaria.

Airbnbs de-listings will only occur in illegitimate West Bank settlements, the Gang of Five asserted. Airbnb objects to the settlements not because they are Jewish but because they usurp Palestinian land.

The claim that every Jewish community in the territories is illegitimate and usurps Palestinian land is, of course, a vicious lie. It echoes the longtime Arab propaganda argument that Jews have no valid religious, historic, or legal connection to Judea and Samariathe territories that have been the heart of the national Jewish homeland for 3,000 years.

In the view of these five groups, every inch of Judea and Samaria is Palestinian land, and any Jew who lives there is an usurper who deserves to be boycotted, treated as a pariah, and eventually driven out.

Obviously if Jewish leftwing groups choose to support anti-Jewish discriminationby boycotting only Jewish settlements and not Arab onesthat is their right according the U.S. Constitution. And if these groups want to advocate that every inch of Judea and Samaria is usurped Palestinian land, that, too, is their right.

But that does not mean the organized American Jewish community has to treat such racist positions as legitimate.

The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organization overwhelmingly rejected J Streets application for membership several years ago. That was a wise move. Jewish umbrella groups that have relationships with the New Israel Fund and the other members of the Gang of Five should reconsider whether they want to maintain those relationships.

Partners for Progressive Israel (PPI), for example, is a member of the American Zionist Movement. Its fair to ask whether PPIs support for discrimination against Israeli Jews is consistent with the AZMs declared mission is to strengthen the connection of American Jews with Israel; develop their appreciation of the centrality of Israel to Jewish life worldwide; deepen their understanding of Israeli society and the challenges it faces; encourage travel, long-term visits and Aliyah to Israel; and to facilitate dialogue, debate and collective action to further Zionism in the United States and abroad.

Is advocating discrimination against Jews in Judea-Samaria consistent with the AZMs mission statement?

Free speech is a sacred principle. I would never advocate that any point of view should be suppressed or prohibited. At the same time, Jewish umbrella organizations have no obligation to embrace those whose activities conflict with the umbrella groups declared mission. Refraining from such an embrace would not impinge on the radicals right or ability to say what they want. It would simply mean not conferring Jewish communal legitimacy upon those who are now promoting discrimination against some Jews.

Original post:

Americas Jewish left endorses anti-Jewish discrimination …

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Anti-Jewish  Comments Closed

Marcion – Anti-Jewish | Christian Forums

Evidence of his influence is still seen.

Click to expand…

Thankfully, theology itself in the Early Church doesn’t lend itself to the idea to assume that anything pertaining to the OT was automatically within the negative and only that within the NT was good. For the heresy of Marcionism tried to divorce the God of the OT from the God of the NT in a false scenario …but the Early Church valued OT practice (more shared here, here, here) and thankfully combated him…

And even outside of Marcionism, there were others promoting the spirit of lawlessness whenever they would try to add on to what God commanded of believers in the New Covenant and say that it was a matter of keeping the Law – for in doing so, that’d be a matter of sin. This is what the Ebionites (certain camps of them, specifically) were guilty of opposite of Marcion when they advocated the keeping of all aspects of the OT in order to avoid being lawless as they saw it….for going past what Yeshua noted and what God promoted is what lawlessness is about…..and lawlessness was never about not following all things solely in Mosaic code. When God gave different laws to different groups, that was the Law they were to be for – and to go back to a previous system of law was disobedience in itself – as well as promoting the wrong law.

1 John 3:4 [ Sin and the Child of God ] Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness.5 And you know that He was manifested to take away our sins, and in Him there is no sin.

Click to expand…

Sin is what lawlessness is defined by – not systems of law given at one time or another. To those under the Law of Moses, to go past that was SIN – and at the same time, there were others not bound by the Mosaic Law (like Jethro of Midian and others like Noah ) who were given differing requirements/laws (as the Gentiles were outside of Israel ) and to not be faithful to that was SIN – for them. And likewise, in Matthew 7, many quote that saying “That’s the way Yeshua will speak to the Gentiles since they were lawless (i.e. not under Mosaic Code!!!”) yet the context is one where he was speaking primarily to a Jewish audience – warning them of false prophets who were doing many things that were approved of/asked by the Lord…but it wasn’t His HEART nor was it His Will for them.

There’s an excellent paper on the issue elsewhere if interested – as it address the Anti-Semitism present in Marcionism and other systems that developed to combat it and yet went in other directions. ..for the paper explores Ebionism and Marcionism, two early church heresies which depict the two most antithetical forms of the Judaism-OT and Christianity-NT breach in early Christianity. It addresses Ebionism’s philo-Semitlism and Marcionism’s chagrin for the Jewish roots of Christianity – both shown to be antecedents to certain contemporary heretical conceptions …and both having a corrective found in Paul’s metaphor of God’s revelatiory-redemptive olive tree (Romans 1/:/7-24) which aptly describes the dual necessity of the root and the branches, that is the Old and New Testaments.

Follow this link:

Marcion – Anti-Jewish | Christian Forums

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Anti-Jewish  Comments Closed

1967: USS Liberty attacked by submarine USS Amberjack Crew …

1967: USS Liberty attacked by submarine USS Amberjack Crew member blows whistle

1967: USS Liberty attacked by submarine USS Amberjack – Crew member blows whistle

compilation by Ray Songtree

Most accounts of the attack on the USS Liberty off the coast of Gaza in 1967 blame the Israelis.Then President Johnson is blamed for abandoning the ship, in order to not embarrass ally Israel for its mistake.

However, Johnson is quoted as saying I want that goddamn ship going to the bottom! No help, recall the Wings. He did not just say, stay away, he stated his intention. He wanted the ship to be sunk. The submarine USS Amberjack had escorted the Liberty all the way from West Africa. The Amberjack saw everything that happened, but did not aid the Liberty at all. Also recall that just three years before , the USS Maddox was NOT attacked in Gulf of Tonkin, but U.S. declared war on North Vietnam using the controlled media, claiming there was an attack.

For an 8 minute synopsis of what happened on June 8, 1967 and an introduction to false flag attacks, see this next video. Gulf of Tonkin is discussed. Then we will meet a USS Liberty survivor and hero whistle blower, with new information.

Richard Larry Weaver, who was on the deck of the Liberty when it was attacked almost 50 years ago, has suffered 34 surgeries and still has 60 pieces of shrapnel in his body. He has been in pain for almost 50 years. The Veterans Administration tried to deny him benefits, and changed his paperwork to deny he was ever on the Liberty. He had to fight for any help he got. Through his own investigation, Larry discovered that the submarine USS Amberjack fired the torpedo that hit the Liberty, not an Israeli torpedo boat. You will hear his testimony below. Only 2000 people had seen the youtube below, before I posted this. If you have been in the military or know someone who has, I ask you please to share this post with everyone you know. We have to ask, who are we serving?

Just as the Gulf of Tonkin incident was falsified so that Johnson could declare war on North Vietnam, a false flag attack on the Liberty was going to be blamed on Egypt. It is most likely that the attack was run by an international group who controlled both the USA and Israel. Five years later, the Bilderberg Group discussed what to do with the glut of petro dollars which Saudi Arabia would need to invest somewhere. They had this discussion 5 months before the price went up! The Bilderberg group was in on the plan for the 1967 Yum Kipper war and the price increase. Did they plan the 1967 attack on the Liberty? What we know for sure is that the U.S. and Israel acted together, not separately that infamous day, and to blame Israel alone is naive. It would also be naive to think that Johnson wanted a war with Vietnam on his own, or that he wanted a war with Egypt on his own. The international bankers created UN, Israel, the FED. Who told Johnson what to do that day?

The first photo to right is the injured US seamen after the June 8, 1967 attack on the USS Liberty. The injured man in foreground is Richard Larry Weaver. In second photo below is Larry on Maui with author Ray Songtree three years ago. Please listen to Larrys account of what happened the day of the attack and his later investigation in youtube below. Thanks to website Federal Jack for producing this youtube. See link. Here is another interpretation of what happened that day.

Veterans need to ask. Is one really a hero to serve treasonous liars? At what point since the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin Incident, which was excuse to kill 3 million people in Southeast Asia, has our government ever become honest?

Is it patriotism to serve a flag run secretly by Globalists who care about nothing but their own power? Is it patriotism to be cannon fodder or to live with guilt the rest of your life? There are 22 veterans every day killing themselves because they know they were not heroes and saw and did things they cannot be proud of. Who are we serving? It is time to ask questions. It is time to be very brave, like Larry, and find out the truth.

Next, the testimony of Richard Larry Weaver. Here he discusses the USS Amberjack torpedo. Links to two more interviews below.

Second interview with Larry Weaver here. First 10 minutes is repeat, then new material.

Interview with another USS Liberty survivor Ernie Gallo.

Israeli Pilot Speaks Up

http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0693/9306019.htm

Fifteen years after the attack, an Israeli pilot approached Liberty survivors and then held extensive interviews with former Congressman Paul N. (Pete) McCloskey about his role. According to this senior Israeli lead pilot, he recognized the Liberty as American immediately, so informed his headquarters, and was told to ignore the American flag and continue his attack. He refused to do so and returned to base, where he was arrested.Later, a dual-citizen Israeli major told survivors that he was in an Israeli war room where he heard that pilots radio report. The attacking pilots and everyone in the Israeli war room knew that they were attacking an American ship, the major said. He recanted the statement only after he received threatening phone calls from Israel.

The pilots protests also were heard by radio monitors in the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon. Then-U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Dwight Porter has confirmed this. Porter told his story to syndicated columnists Rowland Evans and Robert Novak and offered to submit to further questioning by authorities. Unfortunately, no one in the U.S. government has any interest in hearing these first-person accounts of Israeli treachery.

Key members of the Lyndon Johnson administration have long agreed that this attack was no accident. Perhaps most outspoken is former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Thomas Moorer. I can never accept the claim that this was a mistaken attack, he insists. Former Secretary of State Dean Rusk is equally outspoken, calling the attack deliberate in press and radio interviews. Similarly strong language comes from top leaders of the Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency (some of whose personnel were among the victims), National Security Council, and from presidential advisers such as Clark Clifford, Joseph Califano and Lucius Battle.

A top-secret analysis of Israels excuse conducted by the Department of State found Israels story to be untrue. Yet Israel and its defenders continue to stand by their claim that the attack was a tragic accident in which Israel mistook the most modern electronic surveillance vessel in the world for a rusted-out 40-year-old Egyptian horse transport. Despite the evidence, no U.S. administration has never found the courage to defy the Israeli lobby by publicly demanding a proper accounting from Israel.

**********

Remember, the USS Amberjack fired the torpedo. Israel will never admit anything because Israel works for the same Globalists that Johnson worked for. They have already said their torpedoes missed.

The rest is here:

1967: USS Liberty attacked by submarine USS Amberjack Crew …

Fair Usage Law

December 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: USS Liberty  Comments Closed

THE TRUTH ABOUT the USS LIBERTY – HONORING AMERICAS FORGOTTEN …

The Loss of Liberty — Why Did the U.S. Allow Israel To Attack Its Largest Spyship Killing 34 Americans and Wounding Over 170 Others?The USS Liberty was an electronic intelligence-gathering ship that was cruising international waters off the Egyptian coast on June 8, 1967. Israeli planes and torpedo boats opened fire on the Liberty in the midst of what became known as the Israeli-Arab Six-Day War. 34 Americans were killed and more than 170 were wounded in the attack.Israel and its supporters have long maintained that the attack was a “tragic case of misidentification,” an explanation that Lyndon Johnson’s administration did not formally challenge. Israel claimed its forces thought the ship was an Egyptian vessel and apologized to the United States.After the attack, a Navy court of inquiry concluded there was insufficient information to make a judgment about why Israel attacked the ship, stopping short of assigning blame or determining whether it was an accident.On Wednesday, a former top Navy attorney publicly said for the first time that President Lyndon Johnson and Defense Secretary Robert McNamara ordered the U.S. military investigation to conclude that the Israeli attack was an accident.

24 May 1967.U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) orders USSLiberty, an intelligence-gathering vessel, to depart Abidjan for eastern Mediterranean, via Rota, Spain.

1 June 1967.Commanded by Capt. William McGonagle,Libertyarrives at Rota to load technical support material and supplies.

2 June 1967.Libertydeparts Rota at top speed of 18 knots en route to a point 13 miles off the Gaza Strip, well within international waters.

5 June 1967, 7:45 (all times cited are localLibertytime).Israel attacks Egypt, simultaneously putting out false reports that Egypt had attacked first. Captain McGonagle asks Vice Admiral William Martin at Sixth Fleet headquarters to send a destroyer as an armed escort and auxiliary communication center, noting thatLibertys self defense capability limited to four .50 caliber machine guns and small arms.

6 June 1967.Admiral Martin replies Libertyis clearly marked United States ship in international waters, not a participant in the conflict and not a reasonable subject for attack by any nation . . . Request for escort denied.

7 June 1967,shortly before midnight. Office of the U.S. Defense Attach in Tel Aviv sends coded message to U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) that Israel intends to attack theLibertyif her course is not changed.

8 June 1967:

9 June 1967:

After midnight:Soviet guided missile destroyer sends flashing-light message in English: Do you need help?Libertyresponds: No thank you. Soviets answer: I will stand by in case you need me.

11 June 1967:Admiral Kidd boardsLibertywith small staff to head Navy Court of Inquiry.

14 June 1967:Libertyarrives in Malta. Total news blackout imposed. Rear Admiral Kidd warns crew: You are never, repeat never, to discuss this with anyone, not even your wives. If you do, you will be court-martialed and will end your lives in prison or worse. Secretary of Defense McNamara informs media that, Department of Defense will have no further comment.

15 June 1967:Secretary of State Dean Rusk tells NATO ambassadors in Luxembourg that Israels attack was deliberate. His remark is reported in European, but not U.S. papers.

18 June 1967:Israeli Court of Inquiry exonerates Israeli government and all those involved, saying that its torpedo boats erroneously reported theLibertys speed at 30 knots instead of 5, and that theLibertyflew no flag and had no identifying markings. Later, Israel will honor Motor Torpedo Boat 203, the one that fired the deadly torpedo at theLiberty, by putting its wheel and bell on display in its naval museum, among those maritime items of which it is most proud.

July 1967:Shortly after the burial of sixLibertycrewmen in Arlington National Cemetery, a monument is erected describing the six as having Died in the Eastern Mediterranean.Libertysurvivors complain that the marking is evasive and improper.

September 1967:State Department legal adviser Carl Salans finds many discrepancies with the Israeli report. His report is classified Top Secret.

11 June 1968:Captain McGonagle is awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor. The Medal, usually presented by the President of the United States at the White House, is presented by the Secretary of the Navy during a hastily arranged ceremony at the Washington D.C. Navy Yard. Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, the Chief of Naval Operations, calls the way the Medal is presented a back-handed slap. Everyone else received their medal at the White House, Moorer will later observe. President Johnson must have been concerned about the reaction of the Israeli lobby.

1980:National Security Agency Director Marshall Carter tells investigative author James Bamford that, regarding the attack on theLiberty, There was no other answer than that it was deliberate.

1981:National Security Agency review, Attack on a Sigint Collector, the USSLibertyIncident, rejects the Israeli Court of Inquirys mistake theory and accuses Israeli fighter pilots and torpedo boat crewmen and commanders of perjury.

1982:Israeli senior lead pilot approaches former Congressman Pete McCloskey and admits that he recognized theLibertyas American immediately, so informed his headquarters, and was told to ignore the American flag and continue his attack. He said he refused to do so and returned to base, where he was arrested.

6 October 1982:A new headstone for the sixLibertycrew members at Arlington National Cemetery is unveiled. This one reads: Killed USSLibertyJune 8, 1967.

1986:Lt. Commander Walter H. Jacobsen writes in Naval Law Review: To speculate on the motives of an attack group that uses unmarked planes and deprives helpless survivors of life rafts raises disturbing possibilities, including the one that theLibertycrew was not meant to survive the attack…

6 November 1991:Columnists Evans and Novak publish interview with Dwight Porter, U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon in 1967, in which Porter says that during or immediately after the attack on theLibertythe CIA station chief showed him transcripts of intercepted Israeli messages. One has Israel ordering the attack on theLiberty, another has an Israeli pilot replying its an American ship. When the order to attack is repeated, the pilot insists he can see the American flag. The pilot is told again: Attack it.

8 June 1997:Adm. Thomas H. Moorer, appointed Chief of Naval Operations shortly after the attack on theLiberty, tells a reunion of survivors: I have to conclude that it was Israels intent to sink theLibertyand leave as few survivors as possible. Israel knew perfectly well that the ship was American.

November 1998:Captain McGonagle breaks his long silence: After many years I finally believe that the attack was deliberate. I dont think there has been an adequate investigation of the incident . . . The flag was flying prior to the attack… McGonagle will die four months later, on March 3, 1999.

Two 12-page articles have appeared in AMEUs bimonthly publicationThe Link:

Ennes, James,Assault on theLiberty, 2002 edition. Available from AMEU, $25.00 Ennes was the lieutenant on watch at the time the Israelis first attacked theLiberty. A full chapter is devoted to Israels motives for knowingly attacking the ship.

Bamford, James,Body of Secrets, 2001 edition. Available from AMEU, $19.95. Bamford offers several important pieces of information previous classified. On page 226, e.g., he tells of President Johnsons reaction:

Tito, Howard.The Loss ofLiberty. This is a 50-minute video made in 2001, and includes graphic footage of the attack, and interviews with high ranking naval personnel. The video is also available through AMEU for $22.50.

Triplett, William, Death on the USSLiberty, in VVA Veteran, Sept-Oct. 2002. Offers chilling interviews with survivors. Larry Weaver, a 21-year-old bosuns mate on theLiberty, who was not expected to live, was airlifted to the USS AMERICA, where he immediately underwent the first of 26 major surgeries. He was subsequently flown to American hospitals in Crete, Italy and Germany, and then sent to the Philadelphia Naval Hospital for recovery. He recalls:

Green, Stephen. i>Taking Sides: Americas Secret Relations with a Militant Israel. Published in 1984 by William Morrow and Company, Inc., this work remains a primary source on the attack and cover-up.

Borne, John.The USSLiberty: Dissenting History Versus Official History. Published in 1995, this book focuses on the contradictions in the various official explanations that have been given for Israels attack on theLiberty.

“What I Saw That Day” by Phil TourneyA survivors account of what happened aboard the USS Liberty while under attack by the Israeli Defense Forces during the Six Days Warhttp://www.amazon.com/Israels-Holocau…

Here is the original post:

THE TRUTH ABOUT the USS LIBERTY – HONORING AMERICAS FORGOTTEN …

Fair Usage Law

December 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: USS Liberty  Comments Closed

USS Liberty Memorial | From the Trenches World Report

Isnt it strange how most of the more-patriotic-than-thou, support our troops gang seem to go silent when the USS Liberty massacre is mentioned? And then there are those among them who even make up excuses for the Israelis.

On the bright side, the casualties taken by the Liberty werent completely in vain. That event helped awaken a lot of people to the treacherous nature of our so-called allies in Israel, and it revealed the level of control Israel had over the US government even back in 1967. Yet Ive found in my daily life that there are still many folks who have never heard of the USS Liberty. Theres plenty more work for all of us to do as far as raising awareness.

See more here:

USS Liberty Memorial | From the Trenches World Report

Fair Usage Law

December 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: USS Liberty  Comments Closed

GDL & The USS LIBERTY

Rick_Heskey has not yet monetized their account but you can still support BitChute.

Thank you for supporting Rick_Heskey, please consider also supporting BitChute.

We offer the following supporter levels, charged monthly, with a variety of associated benefits and rewards:

Subscriptions are unavailable while we locate a new payment processor.

Read more about what happened with our previous provider here.

Bronze

What you get:

Silver

What you get:

Gold

What you get:

* Exclusive mug and T-shirt rewards will be sent after 6 paid months of support, and may be subject to additional charges based on delivery location.

Find more ways to support us on the help-us-grow page.

Link:

GDL & The USS LIBERTY

Fair Usage Law

December 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: USS Liberty  Comments Closed

Barons of Bullshit: A Trip Around the Runnymede Gasbag Community

Linguistics is the scientific study of language, but it hasn’t actually attracted many good scientists. It hasn’t attracted many good writers either. In fact, I would say that the world’s most famous linguist is also one of the world’s worst writers. The Jewish linguist and radical campaigner Noam Chomsky (born 1928) is a gasbag whose […]

Read the original:

Barons of Bullshit: A Trip Around the Runnymede Gasbag Community

Fair Usage Law

December 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Occidental Observer  Comments Closed

Enrique Krauze, Mexico’s Most Prominent Public Intellectual, Hates Trump (and White, Protestant America)

 This piece is an update of my very brief TOO note of 2016, “Enrique Krauze.” Krauze is a Jewish-Mexican historian, essayist, editor, and public intellectual; he can be read in all the most elite places, even dispensing his wisdom in the pinnacle of the journalist profession, the New York Times. In the October, 9, 2017 article […]

Read the original post:

Enrique Krauze, Mexico’s Most Prominent Public Intellectual, Hates Trump (and White, Protestant America)

Fair Usage Law

December 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Occidental Observer  Comments Closed

Quo Vadis Vatican? Jewish involvement in the radical changes of the Second Vatican Council

Add New Here’s to our murder-less mystery story, where its religious-ecclesiastical background calls for careful threading, though no issues of faith or belief are involved. I am referring to the Second Vatican Council, (1961–1964), some of its deliberations, the shadowy maneuvers that brought them about, and the implications and consequences for the brethren and the […]

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Occidental Observer  Comments Closed

Americas Jewish left endorses anti-Jewish discrimination …

Stephen M. Flatow, an attorney in New Jersey, is the father of Alisa Flatow, who was murdered in an Iranian-sponsored Palestinian terrorist attack in 1995. His book, A Fathers Story: My Fight for Justice Against Iranian Terror, has just been published. American Jewish peace activists who have spent much of their lives fighting discrimination against ethnic minorities, have decided there is one form of discrimination they support: discrimination against Jews who reside in Judea-Samaria. I am referring to the open letter about the Airbnb controversy that was issued on December 4 by the New Israel Fund, J Street, Americans for Peace Now, Truah, and Partners for Progressive Israel. Airbnb announced that it will remove listings in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank that are at the core of the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians. If Airbnb had removed listings from all communities in that region, that would not be discriminatory. But thats not what it did. Airbnb removed listings only from Israeli (read: Jewish) communities. Arab settlements were not affected. To appreciate what Airbnb has done, consider the case of the city of Hevron. Some of its Palestinian Arab residents illegally occupy homes that were stolen from Jews during the 1929 pogrom. Deeds exist proving that. Such Palestinian settlements in Hebron are certainly part of the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians. Not only did the Jewish leftwing Gang of Five defend Airbnb in their open letter, but they proceeded to formally delegitimize every Jewish community in Judea-Samaria.But Airbnb is still doing business with them. And what about illegal Palestinian Arab settlements in Shechem, better known as Nablus? Until the 1930s, there was a large and thriving Jewish community there. Today there is not a single Jewish resident in Shechem. Wonder what ever happened to them? Arab pogromists drove them out and took their homes. Airbnb apparently has no problem with that. And neither, it seems, do the New Israel Fund, J Street, et al. Not only did the Jewish leftwing Gang of Five defend Airbnb in their open letter, but they proceeded to formally delegitimize every Jewish community in Judea-Samaria. Airbnbs de-listings will only occur in illegitimate West Bank settlements, the Gang of Five asserted. Airbnb objects to the settlements not because they are Jewish but because they usurp Palestinian land. The claim that every Jewish community in the territories is illegitimate and usurps Palestinian land is, of course, a vicious lie. It echoes the longtime Arab propaganda argument that Jews have no valid religious, historic, or legal connection to Judea and Samariathe territories that have been the heart of the national Jewish homeland for 3,000 years. In the view of these five groups, every inch of Judea and Samaria is Palestinian land, and any Jew who lives there is an usurper who deserves to be boycotted, treated as a pariah, and eventually driven out. Obviously if Jewish leftwing groups choose to support anti-Jewish discriminationby boycotting only Jewish settlements and not Arab onesthat is their right according the U.S. Constitution. And if these groups want to advocate that every inch of Judea and Samaria is usurped Palestinian land, that, too, is their right. But that does not mean the organized American Jewish community has to treat such racist positions as legitimate. The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organization overwhelmingly rejected J Streets application for membership several years ago. That was a wise move. Jewish umbrella groups that have relationships with the New Israel Fund and the other members of the Gang of Five should reconsider whether they want to maintain those relationships. Partners for Progressive Israel (PPI), for example, is a member of the American Zionist Movement. Its fair to ask whether PPIs support for discrimination against Israeli Jews is consistent with the AZMs declared mission is to strengthen the connection of American Jews with Israel; develop their appreciation of the centrality of Israel to Jewish life worldwide; deepen their understanding of Israeli society and the challenges it faces; encourage travel, long-term visits and Aliyah to Israel; and to facilitate dialogue, debate and collective action to further Zionism in the United States and abroad. Is advocating discrimination against Jews in Judea-Samaria consistent with the AZMs mission statement? Free speech is a sacred principle. I would never advocate that any point of view should be suppressed or prohibited. At the same time, Jewish umbrella organizations have no obligation to embrace those whose activities conflict with the umbrella groups declared mission. Refraining from such an embrace would not impinge on the radicals right or ability to say what they want. It would simply mean not conferring Jewish communal legitimacy upon those who are now promoting discrimination against some Jews.

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Anti-Jewish  Comments Closed

Marcion – Anti-Jewish | Christian Forums

Evidence of his influence is still seen. Click to expand… Thankfully, theology itself in the Early Church doesn’t lend itself to the idea to assume that anything pertaining to the OT was automatically within the negative and only that within the NT was good. For the heresy of Marcionism tried to divorce the God of the OT from the God of the NT in a false scenario …but the Early Church valued OT practice (more shared here, here, here) and thankfully combated him… And even outside of Marcionism, there were others promoting the spirit of lawlessness whenever they would try to add on to what God commanded of believers in the New Covenant and say that it was a matter of keeping the Law – for in doing so, that’d be a matter of sin. This is what the Ebionites (certain camps of them, specifically) were guilty of opposite of Marcion when they advocated the keeping of all aspects of the OT in order to avoid being lawless as they saw it….for going past what Yeshua noted and what God promoted is what lawlessness is about…..and lawlessness was never about not following all things solely in Mosaic code. When God gave different laws to different groups, that was the Law they were to be for – and to go back to a previous system of law was disobedience in itself – as well as promoting the wrong law. 1 John 3:4 [ Sin and the Child of God ] Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness.5 And you know that He was manifested to take away our sins, and in Him there is no sin. Click to expand… Sin is what lawlessness is defined by – not systems of law given at one time or another. To those under the Law of Moses, to go past that was SIN – and at the same time, there were others not bound by the Mosaic Law (like Jethro of Midian and others like Noah ) who were given differing requirements/laws (as the Gentiles were outside of Israel ) and to not be faithful to that was SIN – for them. And likewise, in Matthew 7, many quote that saying “That’s the way Yeshua will speak to the Gentiles since they were lawless (i.e. not under Mosaic Code!!!”) yet the context is one where he was speaking primarily to a Jewish audience – warning them of false prophets who were doing many things that were approved of/asked by the Lord…but it wasn’t His HEART nor was it His Will for them. There’s an excellent paper on the issue elsewhere if interested – as it address the Anti-Semitism present in Marcionism and other systems that developed to combat it and yet went in other directions. ..for the paper explores Ebionism and Marcionism, two early church heresies which depict the two most antithetical forms of the Judaism-OT and Christianity-NT breach in early Christianity. It addresses Ebionism’s philo-Semitlism and Marcionism’s chagrin for the Jewish roots of Christianity – both shown to be antecedents to certain contemporary heretical conceptions …and both having a corrective found in Paul’s metaphor of God’s revelatiory-redemptive olive tree (Romans 1/:/7-24) which aptly describes the dual necessity of the root and the branches, that is the Old and New Testaments.

Fair Usage Law

December 9, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Anti-Jewish  Comments Closed

1967: USS Liberty attacked by submarine USS Amberjack Crew …

1967: USS Liberty attacked by submarine USS Amberjack Crew member blows whistle https://lipstick-and-war-crimes.org/1967-uss-liberty-attacked-by-submarine-uss-amberjack-crew-member-blows-whistle/ compilation by Ray Songtree Most accounts of the attack on the USS Liberty off the coast of Gaza in 1967 blame the Israelis.Then President Johnson is blamed for abandoning the ship, in order to not embarrass ally Israel for its mistake. However, Johnson is quoted as saying I want that goddamn ship going to the bottom! No help, recall the Wings. He did not just say, stay away, he stated his intention. He wanted the ship to be sunk. The submarine USS Amberjack had escorted the Liberty all the way from West Africa. The Amberjack saw everything that happened, but did not aid the Liberty at all. Also recall that just three years before , the USS Maddox was NOT attacked in Gulf of Tonkin, but U.S. declared war on North Vietnam using the controlled media, claiming there was an attack. For an 8 minute synopsis of what happened on June 8, 1967 and an introduction to false flag attacks, see this next video. Gulf of Tonkin is discussed. Then we will meet a USS Liberty survivor and hero whistle blower, with new information. Richard Larry Weaver, who was on the deck of the Liberty when it was attacked almost 50 years ago, has suffered 34 surgeries and still has 60 pieces of shrapnel in his body. He has been in pain for almost 50 years. The Veterans Administration tried to deny him benefits, and changed his paperwork to deny he was ever on the Liberty. He had to fight for any help he got. Through his own investigation, Larry discovered that the submarine USS Amberjack fired the torpedo that hit the Liberty, not an Israeli torpedo boat. You will hear his testimony below. Only 2000 people had seen the youtube below, before I posted this. If you have been in the military or know someone who has, I ask you please to share this post with everyone you know. We have to ask, who are we serving? Just as the Gulf of Tonkin incident was falsified so that Johnson could declare war on North Vietnam, a false flag attack on the Liberty was going to be blamed on Egypt. It is most likely that the attack was run by an international group who controlled both the USA and Israel. Five years later, the Bilderberg Group discussed what to do with the glut of petro dollars which Saudi Arabia would need to invest somewhere. They had this discussion 5 months before the price went up! The Bilderberg group was in on the plan for the 1967 Yum Kipper war and the price increase. Did they plan the 1967 attack on the Liberty? What we know for sure is that the U.S. and Israel acted together, not separately that infamous day, and to blame Israel alone is naive. It would also be naive to think that Johnson wanted a war with Vietnam on his own, or that he wanted a war with Egypt on his own. The international bankers created UN, Israel, the FED. Who told Johnson what to do that day? The first photo to right is the injured US seamen after the June 8, 1967 attack on the USS Liberty. The injured man in foreground is Richard Larry Weaver. In second photo below is Larry on Maui with author Ray Songtree three years ago. Please listen to Larrys account of what happened the day of the attack and his later investigation in youtube below. Thanks to website Federal Jack for producing this youtube. See link. Here is another interpretation of what happened that day. Veterans need to ask. Is one really a hero to serve treasonous liars? At what point since the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin Incident, which was excuse to kill 3 million people in Southeast Asia, has our government ever become honest? Is it patriotism to serve a flag run secretly by Globalists who care about nothing but their own power? Is it patriotism to be cannon fodder or to live with guilt the rest of your life? There are 22 veterans every day killing themselves because they know they were not heroes and saw and did things they cannot be proud of. Who are we serving? It is time to ask questions. It is time to be very brave, like Larry, and find out the truth. Next, the testimony of Richard Larry Weaver. Here he discusses the USS Amberjack torpedo. Links to two more interviews below. Second interview with Larry Weaver here. First 10 minutes is repeat, then new material. Interview with another USS Liberty survivor Ernie Gallo. Israeli Pilot Speaks Up http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0693/9306019.htm Fifteen years after the attack, an Israeli pilot approached Liberty survivors and then held extensive interviews with former Congressman Paul N. (Pete) McCloskey about his role. According to this senior Israeli lead pilot, he recognized the Liberty as American immediately, so informed his headquarters, and was told to ignore the American flag and continue his attack. He refused to do so and returned to base, where he was arrested.Later, a dual-citizen Israeli major told survivors that he was in an Israeli war room where he heard that pilots radio report. The attacking pilots and everyone in the Israeli war room knew that they were attacking an American ship, the major said. He recanted the statement only after he received threatening phone calls from Israel. The pilots protests also were heard by radio monitors in the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon. Then-U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Dwight Porter has confirmed this. Porter told his story to syndicated columnists Rowland Evans and Robert Novak and offered to submit to further questioning by authorities. Unfortunately, no one in the U.S. government has any interest in hearing these first-person accounts of Israeli treachery. Key members of the Lyndon Johnson administration have long agreed that this attack was no accident. Perhaps most outspoken is former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Thomas Moorer. I can never accept the claim that this was a mistaken attack, he insists. Former Secretary of State Dean Rusk is equally outspoken, calling the attack deliberate in press and radio interviews. Similarly strong language comes from top leaders of the Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency (some of whose personnel were among the victims), National Security Council, and from presidential advisers such as Clark Clifford, Joseph Califano and Lucius Battle. A top-secret analysis of Israels excuse conducted by the Department of State found Israels story to be untrue. Yet Israel and its defenders continue to stand by their claim that the attack was a tragic accident in which Israel mistook the most modern electronic surveillance vessel in the world for a rusted-out 40-year-old Egyptian horse transport. Despite the evidence, no U.S. administration has never found the courage to defy the Israeli lobby by publicly demanding a proper accounting from Israel. ********** Remember, the USS Amberjack fired the torpedo. Israel will never admit anything because Israel works for the same Globalists that Johnson worked for. They have already said their torpedoes missed.

Fair Usage Law

December 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: USS Liberty  Comments Closed

THE TRUTH ABOUT the USS LIBERTY – HONORING AMERICAS FORGOTTEN …

The Loss of Liberty — Why Did the U.S. Allow Israel To Attack Its Largest Spyship Killing 34 Americans and Wounding Over 170 Others?The USS Liberty was an electronic intelligence-gathering ship that was cruising international waters off the Egyptian coast on June 8, 1967. Israeli planes and torpedo boats opened fire on the Liberty in the midst of what became known as the Israeli-Arab Six-Day War. 34 Americans were killed and more than 170 were wounded in the attack.Israel and its supporters have long maintained that the attack was a “tragic case of misidentification,” an explanation that Lyndon Johnson’s administration did not formally challenge. Israel claimed its forces thought the ship was an Egyptian vessel and apologized to the United States.After the attack, a Navy court of inquiry concluded there was insufficient information to make a judgment about why Israel attacked the ship, stopping short of assigning blame or determining whether it was an accident.On Wednesday, a former top Navy attorney publicly said for the first time that President Lyndon Johnson and Defense Secretary Robert McNamara ordered the U.S. military investigation to conclude that the Israeli attack was an accident. 24 May 1967.U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) orders USSLiberty, an intelligence-gathering vessel, to depart Abidjan for eastern Mediterranean, via Rota, Spain. 1 June 1967.Commanded by Capt. William McGonagle,Libertyarrives at Rota to load technical support material and supplies. 2 June 1967.Libertydeparts Rota at top speed of 18 knots en route to a point 13 miles off the Gaza Strip, well within international waters. 5 June 1967, 7:45 (all times cited are localLibertytime).Israel attacks Egypt, simultaneously putting out false reports that Egypt had attacked first. Captain McGonagle asks Vice Admiral William Martin at Sixth Fleet headquarters to send a destroyer as an armed escort and auxiliary communication center, noting thatLibertys self defense capability limited to four .50 caliber machine guns and small arms. 6 June 1967.Admiral Martin replies Libertyis clearly marked United States ship in international waters, not a participant in the conflict and not a reasonable subject for attack by any nation . . . Request for escort denied. 7 June 1967,shortly before midnight. Office of the U.S. Defense Attach in Tel Aviv sends coded message to U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) that Israel intends to attack theLibertyif her course is not changed. 8 June 1967: 9 June 1967: After midnight:Soviet guided missile destroyer sends flashing-light message in English: Do you need help?Libertyresponds: No thank you. Soviets answer: I will stand by in case you need me. 11 June 1967:Admiral Kidd boardsLibertywith small staff to head Navy Court of Inquiry. 14 June 1967:Libertyarrives in Malta. Total news blackout imposed. Rear Admiral Kidd warns crew: You are never, repeat never, to discuss this with anyone, not even your wives. If you do, you will be court-martialed and will end your lives in prison or worse. Secretary of Defense McNamara informs media that, Department of Defense will have no further comment. 15 June 1967:Secretary of State Dean Rusk tells NATO ambassadors in Luxembourg that Israels attack was deliberate. His remark is reported in European, but not U.S. papers. 18 June 1967:Israeli Court of Inquiry exonerates Israeli government and all those involved, saying that its torpedo boats erroneously reported theLibertys speed at 30 knots instead of 5, and that theLibertyflew no flag and had no identifying markings. Later, Israel will honor Motor Torpedo Boat 203, the one that fired the deadly torpedo at theLiberty, by putting its wheel and bell on display in its naval museum, among those maritime items of which it is most proud. July 1967:Shortly after the burial of sixLibertycrewmen in Arlington National Cemetery, a monument is erected describing the six as having Died in the Eastern Mediterranean.Libertysurvivors complain that the marking is evasive and improper. September 1967:State Department legal adviser Carl Salans finds many discrepancies with the Israeli report. His report is classified Top Secret. 11 June 1968:Captain McGonagle is awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor. The Medal, usually presented by the President of the United States at the White House, is presented by the Secretary of the Navy during a hastily arranged ceremony at the Washington D.C. Navy Yard. Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, the Chief of Naval Operations, calls the way the Medal is presented a back-handed slap. Everyone else received their medal at the White House, Moorer will later observe. President Johnson must have been concerned about the reaction of the Israeli lobby. 1980:National Security Agency Director Marshall Carter tells investigative author James Bamford that, regarding the attack on theLiberty, There was no other answer than that it was deliberate. 1981:National Security Agency review, Attack on a Sigint Collector, the USSLibertyIncident, rejects the Israeli Court of Inquirys mistake theory and accuses Israeli fighter pilots and torpedo boat crewmen and commanders of perjury. 1982:Israeli senior lead pilot approaches former Congressman Pete McCloskey and admits that he recognized theLibertyas American immediately, so informed his headquarters, and was told to ignore the American flag and continue his attack. He said he refused to do so and returned to base, where he was arrested. 6 October 1982:A new headstone for the sixLibertycrew members at Arlington National Cemetery is unveiled. This one reads: Killed USSLibertyJune 8, 1967. 1986:Lt. Commander Walter H. Jacobsen writes in Naval Law Review: To speculate on the motives of an attack group that uses unmarked planes and deprives helpless survivors of life rafts raises disturbing possibilities, including the one that theLibertycrew was not meant to survive the attack… 6 November 1991:Columnists Evans and Novak publish interview with Dwight Porter, U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon in 1967, in which Porter says that during or immediately after the attack on theLibertythe CIA station chief showed him transcripts of intercepted Israeli messages. One has Israel ordering the attack on theLiberty, another has an Israeli pilot replying its an American ship. When the order to attack is repeated, the pilot insists he can see the American flag. The pilot is told again: Attack it. 8 June 1997:Adm. Thomas H. Moorer, appointed Chief of Naval Operations shortly after the attack on theLiberty, tells a reunion of survivors: I have to conclude that it was Israels intent to sink theLibertyand leave as few survivors as possible. Israel knew perfectly well that the ship was American. November 1998:Captain McGonagle breaks his long silence: After many years I finally believe that the attack was deliberate. I dont think there has been an adequate investigation of the incident . . . The flag was flying prior to the attack… McGonagle will die four months later, on March 3, 1999. Two 12-page articles have appeared in AMEUs bimonthly publicationThe Link: Ennes, James,Assault on theLiberty, 2002 edition. Available from AMEU, $25.00 Ennes was the lieutenant on watch at the time the Israelis first attacked theLiberty. A full chapter is devoted to Israels motives for knowingly attacking the ship. Bamford, James,Body of Secrets, 2001 edition. Available from AMEU, $19.95. Bamford offers several important pieces of information previous classified. On page 226, e.g., he tells of President Johnsons reaction: Tito, Howard.The Loss ofLiberty. This is a 50-minute video made in 2001, and includes graphic footage of the attack, and interviews with high ranking naval personnel. The video is also available through AMEU for $22.50. Triplett, William, Death on the USSLiberty, in VVA Veteran, Sept-Oct. 2002. Offers chilling interviews with survivors. Larry Weaver, a 21-year-old bosuns mate on theLiberty, who was not expected to live, was airlifted to the USS AMERICA, where he immediately underwent the first of 26 major surgeries. He was subsequently flown to American hospitals in Crete, Italy and Germany, and then sent to the Philadelphia Naval Hospital for recovery. He recalls: Green, Stephen. i> Taking Sides: Americas Secret Relations with a Militant Israel. Published in 1984 by William Morrow and Company, Inc., this work remains a primary source on the attack and cover-up. Borne, John.The USSLiberty: Dissenting History Versus Official History. Published in 1995, this book focuses on the contradictions in the various official explanations that have been given for Israels attack on theLiberty. “What I Saw That Day” by Phil TourneyA survivors account of what happened aboard the USS Liberty while under attack by the Israeli Defense Forces during the Six Days Warhttp://www.amazon.com/Israels-Holocau…

Fair Usage Law

December 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: USS Liberty  Comments Closed

USS Liberty Memorial | From the Trenches World Report

Isnt it strange how most of the more-patriotic-than-thou, support our troops gang seem to go silent when the USS Liberty massacre is mentioned? And then there are those among them who even make up excuses for the Israelis. On the bright side, the casualties taken by the Liberty werent completely in vain. That event helped awaken a lot of people to the treacherous nature of our so-called allies in Israel, and it revealed the level of control Israel had over the US government even back in 1967. Yet Ive found in my daily life that there are still many folks who have never heard of the USS Liberty. Theres plenty more work for all of us to do as far as raising awareness.

Fair Usage Law

December 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: USS Liberty  Comments Closed

GDL & The USS LIBERTY

Rick_Heskey has not yet monetized their account but you can still support BitChute. Thank you for supporting Rick_Heskey, please consider also supporting BitChute. We offer the following supporter levels, charged monthly, with a variety of associated benefits and rewards: Subscriptions are unavailable while we locate a new payment processor. Read more about what happened with our previous provider here. Bronze What you get: Silver What you get: Gold What you get: * Exclusive mug and T-shirt rewards will be sent after 6 paid months of support, and may be subject to additional charges based on delivery location. Find more ways to support us on the help-us-grow page.

Fair Usage Law

December 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: USS Liberty  Comments Closed

Barons of Bullshit: A Trip Around the Runnymede Gasbag Community

Linguistics is the scientific study of language, but it hasn’t actually attracted many good scientists. It hasn’t attracted many good writers either. In fact, I would say that the world’s most famous linguist is also one of the world’s worst writers. The Jewish linguist and radical campaigner Noam Chomsky (born 1928) is a gasbag whose […]

Fair Usage Law

December 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Occidental Observer  Comments Closed

Enrique Krauze, Mexico’s Most Prominent Public Intellectual, Hates Trump (and White, Protestant America)

 This piece is an update of my very brief TOO note of 2016, “Enrique Krauze.” Krauze is a Jewish-Mexican historian, essayist, editor, and public intellectual; he can be read in all the most elite places, even dispensing his wisdom in the pinnacle of the journalist profession, the New York Times. In the October, 9, 2017 article […]

Fair Usage Law

December 8, 2018  Tags:   Posted in: Occidental Observer  Comments Closed


Fair Use Disclaimer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Under the 'fair use' rule of copyright law, an author may make limited use of another author's work without asking permission. Fair use is based on the belief that the public is entitled to freely use portions of copyrighted materials for purposes of commentary and criticism. The fair use privilege is perhaps the most significant limitation on a copyright owner's exclusive rights.

Fair use as described at 17 U.S.C. Section 107:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phono-records or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:

  • (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for or nonprofit educational purposes,
  • (2) the nature of the copyrighted work,
  • (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and
  • (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."